REVIEW 1 cited by
A Comprehensive Study on Model Initialization Techniques Ensuring Efficient Federated Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Advancement in the field of machine learning is unavoidable, but something of major concern is preserving the privacy of the users whose data is being used for training these machine learning algorithms. Federated learning(FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training machine learning models in a distributed and privacy-preserving manner which enables one to collaborate and train a global model without sharing local data. But starting this learning process on each device in the right way, called ``model initialization" is critical. The choice of initialization methods used for models plays a crucial role in the performance, convergence speed, communication efficiency, privacy guarantees of federated learning systems, etc. In this survey, we dive deeper into a comprehensive study of various ways of model initialization techniques in FL.Unlike other studies, our research meticulously compares, categorizes, and delineates the merits and demerits of each technique, examining their applicability across diverse FL scenarios. We highlight how factors like client variability, data non-IIDness, model caliber, security considerations, and network restrictions influence FL model outcomes and propose how strategic initialization can address and potentially rectify many such challenges. The motivation behind this survey is to highlight that the right start can help overcome challenges like varying data quality, security issues, and network problems. Our insights provide a foundational base for experts looking to fully utilize FL, also while understanding the complexities of model initialization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Fairness in Federated Learning: Fairness for Whom?
A critical review of 121 federated learning fairness papers identifies five recurring pitfalls and proposes a harm-centered, lifecycle-based framework.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.