Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Task Arithmetic with LoRA for Continual Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.02428 v1 pith:7HUAXI2L submitted 2023-11-04 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords methodcontinuallearningmodelsproblemtasktrainingarithmetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual learning refers to the problem where the training data is available in sequential chunks, termed "tasks". The majority of progress in continual learning has been stunted by the problem of catastrophic forgetting, which is caused by sequential training of the model on streams of data. Moreover, it becomes computationally expensive to sequentially train large models multiple times. To mitigate both of these problems at once, we propose a novel method to continually train transformer-based vision models using low-rank adaptation and task arithmetic. Our method completely bypasses the problem of catastrophic forgetting, as well as reducing the computational requirement for training models on each task. When aided with a small memory of 10 samples per class, our method achieves performance close to full-set finetuning. We present rigorous ablations to support the prowess of our method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ReqBrain: Task-Specific Instruction Tuning of LLMs for AI-Assisted Requirements Generation

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ReqBrain, a LoRA-fine-tuned Zephyr-7b-beta model, produces software requirements that human evaluators could not reliably tell apart from human-authored ones, with automatic metrics favoring it over untuned ChatGPT-4o.

Pith tools