REVIEW 1 cited by
Can Large Language Models Augment a Biomedical Ontology with missing Concepts and Relations?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Ontologies play a crucial role in organizing and representing knowledge. However, even current ontologies do not encompass all relevant concepts and relationships. Here, we explore the potential of large language models (LLM) to expand an existing ontology in a semi-automated fashion. We demonstrate our approach on the biomedical ontology SNOMED-CT utilizing semantic relation types from the widely used UMLS semantic network. We propose a method that uses conversational interactions with an LLM to analyze clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and detect the relationships among the new medical concepts that are not present in SNOMED-CT. Our initial experimentation with the conversational prompts yielded promising preliminary results given a manually generated gold standard, directing our future potential improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Exploring a Large Language Model for Transforming Taxonomic Data into OWL: Lessons Learned and Implications for Ontology Development
A ChatGPT-generated Python script converted 74 plant species from GBIF data into OWL taxonomy files in about 2.5 minutes, outperforming direct ChatGPT browsing, which is slower, error-prone, and now unreproducible.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.