Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Large Language Models Augment a Biomedical Ontology with missing Concepts and Relations?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.06858 v1 pith:2TH2LUPU submitted 2023-11-12 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords conceptsontologybiomedicalconversationallanguagelargemodelsontologies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ontologies play a crucial role in organizing and representing knowledge. However, even current ontologies do not encompass all relevant concepts and relationships. Here, we explore the potential of large language models (LLM) to expand an existing ontology in a semi-automated fashion. We demonstrate our approach on the biomedical ontology SNOMED-CT utilizing semantic relation types from the widely used UMLS semantic network. We propose a method that uses conversational interactions with an LLM to analyze clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and detect the relationships among the new medical concepts that are not present in SNOMED-CT. Our initial experimentation with the conversational prompts yielded promising preliminary results given a manually generated gold standard, directing our future potential improvements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring a Large Language Model for Transforming Taxonomic Data into OWL: Lessons Learned and Implications for Ontology Development

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A ChatGPT-generated Python script converted 74 plant species from GBIF data into OWL taxonomy files in about 2.5 minutes, outperforming direct ChatGPT browsing, which is slower, error-prone, and now unreproducible.

Pith tools