Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

GRASP: A novel benchmark for evaluating language GRounding And Situated Physics understanding in multimodal language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09048 v3 pith:A2KBZDEV submitted 2023-11-15 cs.CL

GRASP: A novel benchmark for evaluating language GRounding And Situated Physics understanding in multimodal language models

classification cs.CL
keywords languagegroundingmodelscapabilitiesphysicsbenchmarkgraspintuitive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents GRASP, a novel benchmark to evaluate the language grounding and physical understanding capabilities of video-based multimodal large language models (LLMs). This evaluation is accomplished via a two-tier approach leveraging Unity simulations. The first level tests for language grounding by assessing a model's ability to relate simple textual descriptions with visual information. The second level evaluates the model's understanding of "Intuitive Physics" principles, such as object permanence and continuity. In addition to releasing the benchmark, we use it to evaluate several state-of-the-art multimodal LLMs. Our evaluation reveals significant shortcomings in the language grounding and intuitive physics capabilities of these models. Although they exhibit at least some grounding capabilities, particularly for colors and shapes, these capabilities depend heavily on the prompting strategy. At the same time, all models perform below or at the chance level of 50% in the Intuitive Physics tests, while human subjects are on average 80% correct. These identified limitations underline the importance of using benchmarks like GRASP to monitor the progress of future models in developing these competencies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do generative video models understand physical principles?

    cs.CV 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Physics-IQ benchmark reveals that generative video models exhibit limited physical understanding unrelated to their visual quality.

  2. LiveK12Bench: Have Large Multimodal Models Truly Conquered High School-level Examinations?

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LiveK12Bench is a growing multi-disciplinary benchmark showing LMMs like GPT-5 drop from 79 to 53 under realistic exam constraints including process rigor and efficiency.

  3. PhysMRV: Physical Memory Retrieval and Verification for Physics Plausibility Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Structured physical memories (captions, event graphs, rule cues) retrieved and verified at inference time consistently improve frozen VLMs on physical-plausibility benchmarks without fine-tuning.

  4. VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstruction

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VisPhyWorld evaluates MLLMs' physical reasoning via executable code generation for video reconstruction, with VisPhyBench showing strong semantics but weak parameter inference and dynamics simulation.

  5. Video models are zero-shot learners and reasoners

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generative video models exhibit emergent zero-shot capabilities across perception, manipulation, and basic reasoning tasks.

  6. Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generation

    cs.CV 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PhyGenBench supplies 160 prompts across 27 physical laws and an automated LLM/VLM evaluation pipeline to measure physical commonsense compliance in current text-to-video models.