Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bayes in the age of intelligent machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.10206 v1 pith:OCHGMXJJ submitted 2023-11-16 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords bayesianargueartificialcognitionintelligentmachinesnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The success of methods based on artificial neural networks in creating intelligent machines seems like it might pose a challenge to explanations of human cognition in terms of Bayesian inference. We argue that this is not the case, and that in fact these systems offer new opportunities for Bayesian modeling. Specifically, we argue that Bayesian models of cognition and artificial neural networks lie at different levels of analysis and are complementary modeling approaches, together offering a way to understand human cognition that spans these levels. We also argue that the same perspective can be applied to intelligent machines, where a Bayesian approach may be uniquely valuable in understanding the behavior of large, opaque artificial neural networks that are trained on proprietary data.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools