Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Complement with Multiple Humans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13172 v2 pith:WJPSZ4CI submitted 2023-11-22 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords labelslearninghai-cchumanimagemultiplenoisyclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world image classification tasks tend to be complex, where expert labellers are sometimes unsure about the classes present in the images, leading to the issue of learning with noisy labels (LNL). The ill-posedness of the LNL task requires the adoption of strong assumptions or the use of multiple noisy labels per training image, resulting in accurate models that work well in isolation but fail to optimise human-AI collaborative classification (HAI-CC). Unlike such LNL methods, HAI-CC aims to leverage the synergies between human expertise and AI capabilities but requires clean training labels, limiting its real-world applicability. This paper addresses this gap by introducing the innovative Learning to Complement with Multiple Humans (LECOMH) approach. LECOMH is designed to learn from noisy labels without depending on clean labels, simultaneously maximising collaborative accuracy while minimising the cost of human collaboration, measured by the number of human expert annotations required per image. Additionally, new benchmarks featuring multiple noisy labels for both training and testing are proposed to evaluate HAI-CC methods. Through quantitative comparisons on these benchmarks, LECOMH consistently outperforms competitive HAI-CC approaches, human labellers, multi-rater learning, and noisy-label learning methods across various datasets, offering a promising solution for addressing real-world image classification challenges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CL2DC trains a gating model to choose between AI-only, defer-to-specific-expert, and AI-plus-specific-expert actions while a penalty enforces a target fraction of AI-only decisions.

Pith tools