Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.11976 v2 pith:JHZMF3C6 submitted 2024-11-18 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords cl2dcexpertscooperationcoverage-constrainedhai-cchumanaddressai-only
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human-AI cooperative classification (HAI-CC) approaches aim to develop hybrid intelligent systems that enhance decision-making in various high-stakes real-world scenarios by leveraging both human expertise and AI capabilities. Current HAI-CC methods primarily focus on learning-to-defer (L2D), where decisions are deferred to human experts, and learning-to-complement (L2C), where AI and human experts make predictions cooperatively. However, a notable research gap remains in effectively exploring both L2D and L2C under diverse expert knowledge to improve decision-making, particularly when constrained by the cooperation cost required to achieve a target probability for AI-only selection (i.e., coverage). In this paper, we address this research gap by proposing the Coverage-constrained Learning to Defer and Complement with Specific Experts (CL2DC) method. CL2DC makes final decisions through either AI prediction alone or by deferring to or complementing a specific expert, depending on the input data. Furthermore, we propose a coverage-constrained optimisation to control the cooperation cost, ensuring it approximates a target probability for AI-only selection. This approach enables an effective assessment of system performance within a specified budget. Also, CL2DC is designed to address scenarios where training sets contain multiple noisy-label annotations without any clean-label references. Comprehensive evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that CL2DC achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art HAI-CC methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeCoDe: Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeCoDe combines concept bottleneck models with learning to defer to select per-instance among AI-only, human-only, and AI+human strategies, reporting accuracy gains over binary deferral baselines on three image datasets.

Pith tools