Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Towards a measurement theory in QFT: "Impossible" quantum measurements are possible but not ideal

Quantum Physics · Submitted 22 Nov 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The non-relativistic solution shows that all nonlocal measurements are localizable (i.e., they can be carried out at a distance without violating no-signaling) but they (i) may require arbitrarily large entangled resources and (ii) cannot in general be ideal, i.e., are not immediately reproducible.

how it is stated · asserted 0.81 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2311.13644 (version 2)
Pith IDIKRQ6YUP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFlavio Del Santo, Nicolas Gisin. "Towards a measurement theory in QFT: "Impossible" quantum measurements are possible but not ideal." arXiv:2311.13644 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/IKRQ6YUP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,661 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.64 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.83 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Naive attempts to put together relativity and quantum measurements lead to signaling between space-like separated regions. In QFT, these are known as impossible measurements. We show that the same problem arises in non-relativistic quantum physics, where joint nonlocal measurements (i.e., between systems kept spatially separated) in general lead to signaling, while one would expect no-signaling (based for instance on the principle of no-nonphysical communication). This raises the question: Which nonlocal quantum measurements are physically possible? We review and develop further a non-relativistic quantum information approach developed independently of the impossible measurements in QFT, and show that these two have been addressing virtually the same problem. The non-relativistic solution shows that all nonlocal measurements are localizable (i.e., they can be carried out at a distance without violating no-signaling) but they (i) may require arbitrarily large entangled resources and (ii) cannot in general be ideal, i.e., are not immediately reproducible. These considerations could help guide the development of a complete theory of measurement in QFT.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Naive attempts to put together relativity and quantum measurements lead to signaling between space-like separated regions. background 1.00 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.88
s1 In QFT, these are known as impossible measurements. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 We show that the same problem arises in non-relativistic quantum physics, where joint nonlocal measurements (i.e., between systems kept spatially separated) in general lead to signaling, while one would expect no-signaling (based for instance on the principle of no-nonphysical communication). result 0.75 0.64 0.07 asserted 0.91
s3 This raises the question: Which nonlocal quantum measurements are physically possible? gap 0.91 0.10 0.04 unclear 0.83
s4 We review and develop further a non-relativistic quantum information approach developed independently of the impossible measurements in QFT, and show that these two have been addressing virtually the same problem. contribution 0.87 0.78 0.06 asserted 1.00
s5 The non-relativistic solution shows that all nonlocal measurements are localizable (i.e., they can be carried out at a distance without violating no-signaling) but they (i) may require arbitrarily large entangled resources and (ii) cannot in general be ideal, i.e., are not immediately reproducible. result 0.98 0.61 0.85 asserted 0.81
s6 These considerations could help guide the development of a complete theory of measurement in QFT. future work 0.66 0.17 0.08 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.95 · evidence from argument 0.48.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Naive attempts to put together relativity and quantum measurements lead to signaling between space-like separated regions. In QFT, these are known as impossible measurements. We show that the same problem arises in non-relativistic quantum physics, where joint nonlocal measurements (i.e., between systems kept spatially separated) in general lead to signaling, while one would expect no-signaling (based for instance on the principle of no-nonphysical communication). This raises the question: Which nonlocal quantum measurements are physically possible? We review and develop further a non-relativistic quantum information approach developed independently of the impossible measurements in QFT, and show that these two have been addressing virtually the same problem. The non-relativistic solution shows that all nonlocal measurements are localizable (i.e., they can be carried out at a distance without violating no-signaling) but they (i) may require arbitrarily large entangled resources and (ii) cannot in general be ideal, i.e., are not immediately reproducible. These considerations could help guide the development of a complete theory of measurement in QFT.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 3 papers
  • Sorkin's impossible measurements in QFT have recently received a great deal of attention, mostly thanks to a proposed solution that, at last, puts forward an explicit measurement scheme for QFT [ref] .

    Measurement in Quantum Field Theory · Discussion and outlook · 0.87

  • The problem of impossible measurements in QFT has gained interest in recent years (for a historical review, see [ref] ) and two main approaches have been proposed to solve this conundrum: The first one, pursued in Refs. [ref] , accepts that microcausality is not enough to single out the physical measurements and puts forward further constraints.

    Eliminating the "impossible": Recent progress on local measurement theory for quantum field theory · Introduction · 0.97

  • The Elegant Joint Measurement (EJM) is an observable whose eigenvectors form a basis of partially entangled states (all with the same degree of entanglement) with particular symmetry properties [ref] (see also [ref] for a classification of joint entangled measurements of two qubits).

    Iso-entangled bases and joint measurements · Elegant Joint Measurements · 0.94

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.