pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.14112 · v2 · pith:PNGUTN7Xnew · submitted 2023-11-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Phonon collapse and anharmonic melting of the 3D charge-density wave in kagome metals

Martin Gutierrez-Amigo , {\DH}or{\dj}e Dangi\'c , Chunyu Guo , Claudia Felser , Philip J. W. Moll , Maia G. Vergniory , Ion Errea This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords charge-density wavekagome metalsCsV3Sb5electron-phonon couplinganharmonicityphonon instability3D CDW
0
0 comments X

The pith

The charge-density wave in CsV3Sb5 is a three-dimensional state triggered by an L-point phonon instability from strong electron-phonon coupling and melted by anharmonic ionic entropy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the charge-density wave transition in CsV3Sb5 is driven by large electron-phonon coupling that produces an unstable phonon at the L point, making the CDW three-dimensional rather than two-dimensional as expected from a pure kagome lattice. It further shows that the ordered state melts at the transition temperature because of ionic entropy arising from lattice anharmonicity, with the computed temperature agreeing closely with experiment. This framework accounts for the absence of observable phonon softening in inelastic scattering through the soft mode's unusually large electron-phonon linewidth. A sympathetic reader would care because the result identifies soft-mode physics as the core driver, constrains the possible CDW symmetries to six space groups, and suggests that anharmonic effects are central to the material's behavior.

Core claim

By employing a non-perturbative treatment of anharmonicity from first-principles calculations, the charge-density transition in CsV3Sb5 is driven by the large electron-phonon coupling of the material and the melting of the CDW state is attributed to ionic entropy and lattice anharmonicity. The calculated transition temperature is in very good agreement with experiments, implying that soft mode physics are at the core of the charge-density wave transition. Contrary to the standard assumption associated with a pure kagome lattice, the CDW is essentially three-dimensional as it is triggered by an unstable phonon at the L point. The absence of involvement of phonons at the M point enables us to

What carries the argument

the L-point phonon instability together with non-perturbative anharmonic free-energy calculations that incorporate ionic entropy

If this is right

  • The CDW state is three-dimensional rather than confined to the kagome planes.
  • The resulting structure is restricted to one of only six possible space groups.
  • The large electron-phonon linewidth of the soft mode explains why inelastic scattering experiments detect no phonon softening.
  • Large anharmonic effects are expected to be common across other kagome-metal families.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same L-point mechanism and anharmonic melting may govern the CDW transitions reported in the isostructural compounds KV3Sb5 and RbV3Sb5.
  • Anharmonicity could modulate the competition or coexistence between the CDW and superconductivity observed in these materials.
  • The computational approach could be applied to predict whether similar phonon-driven, three-dimensional CDWs appear in other layered compounds with strong electron-phonon coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The first-principles electronic-structure calculations and non-perturbative anharmonic treatment accurately capture the electron-phonon coupling strength and entropy contributions without systematic errors that would shift the location of the unstable mode or the predicted transition temperature.

What would settle it

Observation of a soft or unstable phonon at the M point instead of the L point, or a measured transition temperature that deviates substantially from the calculated value once anharmonicity is included, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.14112 by Chunyu Guo, Claudia Felser, {\DH}or{\dj}e Dangi\'c, Ion Errea, Maia G. Vergniory, Martin Gutierrez-Amigo, Philip J. W. Moll.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The charge-density wave (CDW) mechanism and resulting structure of the AV3Sb5 family of kagome metals has posed a puzzling challenge since their discovery four years ago. In fact, the lack of consensus on the origin and structure of the CDW hinders the understanding of the emerging phenomena. Here, by employing a non-perturbative treatment of anharmonicity from first-principles calculations, we reveal that the charge-density transition in CsV3Sb5 is driven by the large electron-phonon coupling of the material and that the melting of the CDW state is attributed to ionic entropy and lattice anharmonicity. The calculated transition temperature is in very good agreement with experiments, implying that soft mode physics are at the core of the charge-density wave transition. Contrary to the standard assumption associated with a pure kagome lattice, the CDW is essentially three-dimensional as it is triggered by an unstable phonon at the L point. The absence of involvement of phonons at the M point enables us to constrain the resulting symmetries to six possible space groups. The unusually large electron-phonon linewidth of the soft mode explains why inelastic scattering experiments did not observe any softened phonon. We foresee that large anharmonic effects are ubiquitous and could be fundamental to understand the observed phenomena also in other kagome families.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses non-perturbative first-principles calculations to show that the CDW transition in CsV3Sb5 is driven by strong electron-phonon coupling that produces an unstable phonon at the L point, rendering the CDW three-dimensional rather than purely kagome-lattice two-dimensional. The melting of the CDW is attributed to ionic entropy and lattice anharmonicity, yielding a transition temperature in good agreement with experiment; this also constrains the possible CDW space groups to six and accounts for the absence of a detectable soft mode in inelastic scattering via a large electron-phonon linewidth.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a quantitative, first-principles account of the CDW mechanism in the AV3Sb5 family that resolves the long-standing puzzle of its origin and dimensionality. The non-perturbative anharmonic treatment, the L-point instability, the six allowed space groups, and the direct match to experimental Tc constitute clear strengths that could generalize to other kagome systems and shift the field toward soft-mode plus anharmonicity interpretations.

minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit statements of the supercell sizes, k-point meshes, and exchange-correlation functional employed for the phonon and anharmonic free-energy calculations, together with any convergence tests performed; these details are standard for reproducibility in first-principles studies of this type.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation to accept the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation relies on standard first-principles DFT phonon calculations, non-perturbative anharmonic free-energy sampling, and direct comparison of the resulting Tc to external experimental values. The L-point instability, 3D character of the CDW, and symmetry constraints emerge from the computed dispersions and entropy terms without any reduction to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation load-bearing premises, or ansatz smuggling. No equations or steps in the provided abstract and methodology exhibit self-definitional equivalence or uniqueness imported from prior author work; the central result remains independently falsifiable against measured transition temperatures and scattering data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculations rest on standard DFT approximations and phonon perturbation theory extended to non-perturbative anharmonicity; no major free parameters are introduced beyond typical computational settings such as functional choice.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Born-Oppenheimer approximation separating electronic and ionic degrees of freedom
    Invoked implicitly in all first-principles phonon and electron-phonon calculations throughout the work.
  • domain assumption Validity of the chosen exchange-correlation functional for describing electron-phonon coupling in this material
    Standard assumption in DFT-based studies; location is the overall computational methodology section implied by the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5805 in / 1638 out tokens · 25643 ms · 2026-05-24T05:38:09.587007+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Syôzi, Progress of Theoretical Physics6, 306 (1951)

    I. Syôzi, Progress of Theoretical Physics6, 306 (1951)

    work page 1951

  2. [2]

    Călugăru, A

    D. Călugăru, A. Chew, L. Elcoro, Y. Xu, N. Regnault, Z.-D. Song, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature Physics18, 185 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, L. Ye, H. C. Po, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin, Nature Communications11, 4004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    M. Kang, L. Ye, S. Fang, J.-S. You, A. Levitan, M. Han, J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, K. Kaznatcheev, E. Vescovo, D. C. Bell, E. Kaxiras, J. van den Brink, M. Richter, M. Prasad Ghimire, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin, Nature Materials19, 163 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Bilitewski, Physical Review B 98 (2018), 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235109

    T. Bilitewski, Physical Review B 98 (2018), 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235109

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.235109 2018

  6. [6]

    N. J. Ghimire and I. I. Mazin, Nature Materials19, 137 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    I. I. Mazin, H. O. Jeschke, F. Lechermann, H. Lee, M. Fink, R. Thomale, and R. Valentí, Nature Commu- nications 5, 4261 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    H. Zhao, H. Li, B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, T. Park, M. Ye, Z. Wang, L. Balents, S. D. Wilson, and I. Zeljkovic, Nature599, 216 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Correlated order at the tipping point in the kagome metal CsV$_3$Sb$_5$,

    C. Guo, G. Wagner, C. Putzke, D. Chen, K. Wang, L.Zhang, M.Gutierrez-Amigo, I.Errea, M.G.Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, “Correlated order at the tipping point in the kagome metal CsV$_3$Sb$_5$,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Sachdev, Physical Review B45, 12377 (1992)

    S. Sachdev, Physical Review B45, 12377 (1992)

    work page 1992

  11. [11]

    J.-X. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature612, 647 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    B. R. Ortiz, L. C. Gomes, J. R. Morey, M. Winiarski, M. Bordelon, J. S. Mangum, I. W. H. Oswald, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. R. Neilson, S. D. Wilson, E. Ertekin, T. M. McQueen, and E. S. Toberer, Physical Review Materials 3, 094407 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    C. Guo, C. Putzke, S. Konyzheva, X. Huang, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, I. Errea, D. Chen, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, Nature , 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Distinct switching of chiral transport in the kagome metals KV$_3$Sb$_5$ and CsV$_3$Sb$_5$,

    C. Guo, M. R. van Delft, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, D. Chen, C. Putzke, G. Wagner, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, I. Errea, M. G. Vergniory, S. Wiedmann, C. Felser, and P. J. W. Moll, “Distinct switching of chiral transport in the kagome metals KV$_3$Sb$_5$ and CsV$_3$Sb$_5$,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Farhang, J

    C. Farhang, J. Wang, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, and J. Xia, Nature Communications14, 5326 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    L. Yu, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, M. Sander, S. Ni, Z. Lu, S. Ma, Z. Wang, Z. Zhao, H. Chen, K. Jiang, Y. Zhang, H. Yang, F. Zhou, X. Dong, S. L. Johnson, M. J. Graf, J. Hu, H.-J. Gao, and Z. Zhao, arXiv:2107.10714 [cond- mat] (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    X. Feng, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and J. Hu, Science Bulletin 66, 1384 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Mielke, D

    C. Mielke, D. Das, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, R. Gupta, Y.- X. Jiang, M. Medarde, X. Wu, H. C. Lei, J. Chang, P. Dai, Q. Si, H. Miao, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, Y. Shi, R. Khasanov, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and 7 Z. Guguchia, Nature602, 245 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Ba- lents, J. He, and S. D. Wilson, Physical Review Letters 125, 247002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Nature599, 222 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [22]

    C. C. Zhao, L. S. Wang, W. Xia, Q. W. Yin, J. M. Ni, Y. Y. Huang, C. P. Tu, Z. C. Tao, Z. J. Tu, C. S. Gong, H. C. Lei, Y. F. Guo, X. F. Yang, and S. Y. Li, arXiv:2102.08356 [cond-mat] (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [23]

    X. Wu, T. Schwemmer, T. Müller, A. Consiglio, G. San- giovanni, D. Di Sante, Y. Iqbal, W. Hanke, A. P. Schny- der, M. M. Denner, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and R.Thomale,PhysicalReviewLetters 127,177001(2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [24]

    Discoveryofcharge-4eandcharge-6esupercon- ductivity in kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5,

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J.Wang,“Discoveryofcharge-4eandcharge-6esupercon- ductivity in kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5,” (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [25]

    Evidence for chiral su- perconductivity in Kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5,

    T. Le, Z. Pan, Z. Xu, J. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Lou, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, C. Wu, and X. Lin, “Evidence for chiral su- perconductivity in Kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [26]

    Ratcliff, L

    N. Ratcliff, L. Hallett, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, and J. W. Harter, Physical Review Materials 5, L111801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [27]

    H. Li, T. T. Zhang, T. Yilmaz, Y. Y. Pai, C. E. Marvin- ney, A. Said, Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, E. Vescovo, C. S. Nelson, R. G. Moore, S. Murakami, H. C. Lei, H. N. Lee, B. J. Lawrie, and H. Miao, Physical Review X11, 031050 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [28]

    G. Liu, X. Ma, K. He, Q. Li, H. Tan, Y. Liu, J. Xu, W. Tang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Gao, Y. Dai, H.-H. Wen, B. Yan, and X. Xi, Nature Communications 13, 3461 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [29]

    Subires, A

    D. Subires, A. Korshunov, A. H. Said, L. Sánchez, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, A. Bosak, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Nature Communications 14, 1015 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [30]

    Y. Xu, Z. Ni, Y. Liu, B. R. Ortiz, Q. Deng, S. D. Wilson, B. Yan, L. Balents, and L. Wu, Nature Physics18, 1470 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [31]

    L. Nie, K. Sun, W. Ma, D. Song, L. Zheng, Z. Liang, P. Wu, F. Yu, J. Li, M. Shan, D. Zhao, S. Li, B. Kang, Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, K. Liu, Z. Xiang, J. Ying, Z. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Nature604, 59 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [32]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, J. Yoo, B. R. Ortiz, Y. M. Oey, J. Choi, S. H. Ryu, J. Kim, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelsky, S. D. Wil- son, J.-H. Park, and R. Comin, Nature Materials 22, 186 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [33]

    Anharmonic Strong-Coupling Effects at the Origin of the Charge Density Wave in CsV$_3$Sb$_5$,

    G. He, L. Peis, E. F. Cuddy, Z. Zhao, D. Li, R. Stum- berger, B. Moritz, H. Yang, H.-J. Gao, T. P. Dev- ereaux, and R. Hackl, “Anharmonic Strong-Coupling Effects at the Origin of the Charge Density Wave in CsV$_3$Sb$_5$,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [34]

    Q.Stahl, D.Chen, T.Ritschel, C.Shekhar, E.Sadrollahi, M. C. Rahn, O. Ivashko, M. v. Zimmermann, C. Felser, and J. Geck, Physical Review B105, 195136 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, L. Kautzsch, P. M. Sarte, N. Ratcliff, J. Harter, J. P. C. Ruff, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Physical Review X11, 041030 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [36]

    Broyles, D

    C. Broyles, D. Graf, H. Yang, X. Dong, H. Gao, and S. Ran, Physical Review Letters129, 157001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [37]

    Q.Xiao, Y.Lin, Q.Li, X.Zheng, S.Francoual, C.Plueck- thun, W. Xia, Q. Qiu, S. Zhang, Y. Guo, J. Feng, and Y. Peng, Physical Review Research5, L012032 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [38]

    Khasanov, D

    R. Khasanov, D. Das, R. Gupta, C. Mielke, M. Elender, Q. Yin, Z. Tu, C. Gong, H. Lei, E. T. Ritz, R. M. Fernan- des, T. Birol, Z. Guguchia, and H. Luetkens, Physical Review Research 4, 023244 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    Z. Shan, P. K. Biswas, S. K. Ghosh, T. Tula, A. D. Hillier, D. Adroja, S. Cottrell, G.-H. Cao, Y. Liu, X. Xu, Y. Song, H. Yuan, and M. Smidman, Physical Review Research 4, 033145 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [40]

    D. R. Saykin, C. Farhang, E. D. Kountz, D. Chen, B. R. Ortiz, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, S. D. Wilson, R. Thomale, J. Xia, and A. Kapitulnik, Physical Review Letters131, 016901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [42]

    Jiang, J.-X

    Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, M. M. Denner, N. Shumiya, B. R. Ortiz, G. Xu, Z. Guguchia, J. He, M. S. Hossain, X. Liu, J. Ruff, L. Kautzsch, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, I. Belopol- ski, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Thomale, T. Neu- pert, S. D. Wilson, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature Materials 20, 1353 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [43]

    M. M. Denner, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Physical Review Letters 127, 217601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [44]

    Lin and R

    Y.-P. Lin and R. M. Nandkishore, Physical Review B 104, 045122 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [45]

    J.-T. Jin, K. Jiang, H. Yao, and Y. Zhou, Physical Re- view Letters 129, 167001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [46]

    J.Deng, R.Zhang, Y.Xie, X.Wu, andZ.Wang,Physical Review B 108, 115123 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [47]

    Y. Xie, Y. Li, P. Bourges, A. Ivanov, Z. Ye, J.-X. Yin, M. Z. Hasan, A. Luo, Y. Yao, Z. Wang, G. Xu, and P. Dai, Physical Review B105, L140501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [48]

    Wang, Y.-X

    Z. Wang, Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, Y. Li, G.-Y. Wang, H.-L. Huang, S. Shao, J. Liu, P. Zhu, N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, H. Liu, Y. Shi, J. Duan, X. Li, G. Chang, P. Dai, Z. Ye, G. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Zheng, J. Jia, M. Z. Hasan, and Y. Yao, Physical Review B104, 075148 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [49]

    Neupert, M

    T. Neupert, M. M. Denner, J.-X. Yin, R. Thomale, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature Physics18, 137 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [50]

    C.Wang, S.Liu, H.Jeon, Y.Jia, andJ.-H.Cho,Physical Review Materials 6, 094801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [51]

    Colossalc-axisresponseand lack of rotational symmetry breaking within the kagome plane of the CsV$_3$Sb$_5$ superconductor,

    M. Frachet, L. Wang, W. Xia, Y. Guo, M. He, N. Maraytta, R. Heid, A.-A. Haghighirad, M. Merz, C.Meingast, andF.Hardy,“Colossalc-axisresponseand lack of rotational symmetry breaking within the kagome plane of the CsV$_3$Sb$_5$ superconductor,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [52]

    Weber, S

    F. Weber, S. Rosenkranz, J.-P. Castellan, R. Osborn, R. Hott, R. Heid, K.-P. Bohnen, T. Egami, A. H. Said, and D. Reznik, Physical Review Letters 107, 107403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [53]

    Diego, A

    J. Diego, A. H. Said, S. K. Mahatha, R. Bianco, L. Mona- celli, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, K. Rossnagel, I. Errea, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Nature Communications12, 598 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [54]

    Bianco, L

    R. Bianco, L. Monacelli, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, and I. Errea, Physical Review Letters125, 106101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [55]

    Ferrari, F

    F. Ferrari, F. Becca, and R. Valentí, Physical Review B 8 106, L081107 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [57]

    Bianco, I

    R. Bianco, I. Errea, L. Monacelli, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Nano Letters19, 3098 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [58]

    Purely anharmonic charge-density wave in the 2D Dirac semimetal SnP,

    M. Gutierrez-Amigo, F. Yuan, D. Campi, L. M. Schoop, M. G. Vergniory, and I. Errea, “Purely anharmonic charge-density wave in the 2D Dirac semimetal SnP,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [59]

    See Supplementary Material for details of the calcula- tionsandexperiments.TheSupplementaryMaterialcites Refs. [20, 41, 50, 56, 60–63, 70–79]

    “See Supplementary Material for details of the calcula- tionsandexperiments.TheSupplementaryMaterialcites Refs. [20, 41, 50, 56, 60–63, 70–79].”

    work page

  57. [64]

    Huang, C

    X. Huang, C. Guo, C. Putzke, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, Y. Sun, M. G. Vergniory, I. Errea, D. Chen, C. Felser, andP.J.W.Moll,PhysicalReviewB 106,064510(2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [65]

    H. T. Stokes and D. M. Hatch, Isotropy Subgroups of the 230 Crystallographic Space Groups (World Scientific, Singapore ; Teaneck, NY, USA, 1988)

    work page 1988

  59. [66]

    Korshunov, H

    A. Korshunov, H. Hu, D. Subires, Y. Jiang, D. Călugăru, X. Feng, A. Rajapitamahuni, C. Yi, S. Roychowdhury, M. G. Vergniory, J. Strempfer, C. Shekhar, E. Vescovo, D. Chernyshov, A. H. Said, A. Bosak, C. Felser, B. A. Bernevig, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Nature Communica- tions 14, 6646 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [67]

    H. Li, S. Cheng, B. R. Ortiz, H. Tan, D. Werhahn, K. Zeng, D. Johrendt, B. Yan, Z. Wang, S. D. Wilson, and I. Zeljkovic, Nature Physics19, 1591 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [68]

    X. Teng, J. S. Oh, H. Tan, L. Chen, J. Huang, B. Gao, J.-X. Yin, J.-H. Chu, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, G. E. Granroth, B. Yan, R. J. Birgeneau, P. Dai, and M. Yi, Nature Physics19, 814 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [69]

    Emer- gent Electronic Kagome Lattice in Correlated Charge- Density-Wave State of 1T-TaS$_2$,

    H. Dong, P. Sun, L. Lei, Y. Geng, J. Guo, Y. Li, L. Huang, R. Xu, F. Pang, W. Ji, W. Zhou, Z. Liu, Z.-Y. Lu, H.-J. Gao, K. Liu, and Z. Cheng, “Emer- gent Electronic Kagome Lattice in Correlated Charge- Density-Wave State of 1T-TaS$_2$,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [71]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. Kü...

    work page 2017

  64. [72]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  65. [79]

    Monacelli and F

    L. Monacelli and F. Mauri, Physical Review B 103, 104305 (2021). Supplementary Material for Phonon collapse and anharmonic melting of the 3D charge-density wave in kagome metals Martin Gutierrez-Amigo,1, 2 Ðorđe Dangić,2, 3 Chunyu Guo,4 Claudia Felser,5 Philip J. W. Moll,4 Maia G. Vergniory,5, 6 and Ion Errea2, 3, 6 1Department of Physics, University of t...

    work page 2021

  66. [80]

    Phonon collapse and anharmonic melting of the 3D charge-density wave in kagome metals

    and considering 9/5/13 valence electrons for ce- sium/antimony/vanadium. In all cases, we used a en- ergy cutoffs of 60/600 Ry for the wavefunctions/density with a Methfessel-Paxton smearing [6] of 0.002 Ry. The structural relaxation was performed using a16×16×10 grid, without accounting for spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and was stopped when pressures were be...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  67. [81]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

    work page 2009

  68. [82]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. Kü...

    work page 2017

  69. [83]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  70. [84]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical Review B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  71. [85]

    Corso, Computational Materials Science 95, 337 (2014)

    A. Corso, Computational Materials Science 95, 337 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [86]

    Methfessel and A

    M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, Physical Review B40, 3616 (1989)

    work page 1989

  73. [87]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Com- munications 185, 2309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  74. [88]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Computer Physics Communications224, 405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [89]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gian- nozzi, Reviews of Modern Physics73, 515 (2001)

    work page 2001

  76. [90]

    Errea, M

    I. Errea, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Physical Review B 89, 064302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [91]

    Bianco, I

    R. Bianco, I. Errea, L. Paulatto, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Physical Review B96, 014111 (2017)

    work page 2017

  78. [92]

    Monacelli, I

    L. Monacelli, I. Errea, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Phys- ical Review B98, 024106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [93]

    Monacelli, R

    L. Monacelli, R. Bianco, M. Cherubini, M. Calandra, I. Errea, and F. Mauri, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 363001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [94]

    Monacelli and F

    L. Monacelli and F. Mauri, Physical Review B 103, 104305 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.