Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.02219 v3 pith:WGUX6YAQ submitted 2023-12-03 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords visualit-lvlmslanguagelargemodelsvisionbenchmarkevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Vision and Language Models have enabled significant advances in fully supervised and zero-shot visual tasks. These large architectures serve as the baseline to what is currently known as Instruction Tuning Large Vision and Language models (IT-LVLMs). IT-LVLMs are general-purpose multi-modal assistants whose responses are modulated by natural language instructions and visual data. Despite this versatility, IT-LVLM effectiveness in fundamental computer vision problems remains unclear, primarily due to the absence of a standardized evaluation benchmark. This paper introduces a Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark named MERLIM, a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks. MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs. Our results bring important insights on the performance of state-of-the-art IT-LVLMs including limitations at identifying fine-grained visual concepts, object hallucinations across tasks, and biases towards the language query. Our findings also suggest that these models have weak visual grounding, but manage to make adequate guesses from global visual patterns or language biases contained in the LLM component. We name this phenomenon of correct answers with no visual grounding as hidden hallucinations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VFaith: Do Large Multimodal Models Really Reason on Seen Images Rather than Previous Memories?

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark with edited-image question pairs shows that multimodal reasoning models lose accuracy when visual cues change, suggesting their reasoning is often not faithfully tied to the image.

  2. Towards Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models by Refining Textual Embeddings

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Injecting an average-pooled visual embedding into every text token improves hallucination-benchmark scores of Video-LLaVA by small single-digit amounts.

  3. Mitigating Behavioral Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models for Sequential Images

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SHE lowers behavioral hallucination scores by about 10 percent by detecting low visual-textual similarity and projecting out the hallucinated direction in embedding space.

  4. MoDA: Modulation Adapter for Fine-Grained Visual Grounding in Instructional MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An instruction-conditioned channel gate on pre-aligned visual tokens improves grounding in LLaVA-style models on most reported benchmarks, but the mechanism is undercut by the paper's own ablation and the abstract ove...

Pith tools