REVIEW 2 cited by
Seller-side Outcome Fairness in Online Marketplaces
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper aims to investigate and achieve seller-side fairness within online marketplaces, where many sellers and their items are not sufficiently exposed to customers in an e-commerce platform. This phenomenon raises concerns regarding the potential loss of revenue associated with less exposed items as well as less marketplace diversity. We introduce the notion of seller-side outcome fairness and build an optimization model to balance collected recommendation rewards and the fairness metric. We then propose a gradient-based data-driven algorithm based on the duality and bandit theory. Our numerical experiments on real e-commerce data sets show that our algorithm can lift seller fairness measures while not hurting metrics like collected Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) and total purchases.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Equity by Design? On the Trade-Offs in Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets
The 'free fairness' result for producer constraints vanishes for multi-item recommendations; a CVaR group-fairness objective and business constraints can be added with moderate trade-offs.
-
ARAG: Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation for Personalized Recommendation
A four-agent LLM pipeline (user understanding, natural language inference, context summarization, and ranking) improves retrieval-augmented product recommendations on Amazon data by up to 42% in NDCG@5 over recency an...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.