Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Invariance & Causal Representation Learning: Prospects and Limitations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.03580 v1 pith:HCTPAIEX submitted 2023-12-06 stat.ML cs.AIcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords causalinvariancevariablesidentifylatentlearningrepresentationtheoretical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In causal models, a given mechanism is assumed to be invariant to changes of other mechanisms. While this principle has been utilized for inference in settings where the causal variables are observed, theoretical insights when the variables of interest are latent are largely missing. We assay the connection between invariance and causal representation learning by establishing impossibility results which show that invariance alone is insufficient to identify latent causal variables. Together with practical considerations, we use these theoretical findings to highlight the need for additional constraints in order to identify representations by exploiting invariance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools