Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Ambiguity Measure for Recognizing the Unknowns in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.06077 v1 pith:L742ONVA submitted 2023-12-11 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords modelambiguityinputsmeasurescopetheyaccuracyadversarial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the understanding of deep neural networks from the scope in which they are trained on. While the accuracy of these models is usually impressive on the aggregate level, they still make mistakes, sometimes on cases that appear to be trivial. Moreover, these models are not reliable in realizing what they do not know leading to failures such as adversarial vulnerability and out-of-distribution failures. Here, we propose a measure for quantifying the ambiguity of inputs for any given model with regard to the scope of its training. We define the ambiguity based on the geometric arrangements of the decision boundaries and the convex hull of training set in the feature space learned by the trained model, and demonstrate that a single ambiguity measure may detect a considerable portion of mistakes of a model on in-distribution samples, adversarial inputs, as well as out-of-distribution inputs. Using our ambiguity measure, a model may abstain from classification when it encounters ambiguous inputs leading to a better model accuracy not just on a given testing set, but on the inputs it may encounter at the world at large. In pursuit of this measure, we develop a theoretical framework that can identify the unknowns of the model in relation to its scope. We put this in perspective with the confidence of the model and develop formulations to identify the regions of the domain which are unknown to the model, yet the model is guaranteed to have high confidence.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Ambiguity Detection (RAD) From Model- and Feature-Space Consistency

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RAD defines a robust-ambiguity score-pair, model-space and feature-space consistency, that flags and diagnoses unreliable predictions before deployment.

Pith tools