REVIEW 1 cited by
One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Neural networks are powerful tools in various applications, and quantifying their uncertainty is crucial for reliable decision-making. In the deep learning field, the uncertainties are usually categorized into aleatoric (data) and epistemic (model) uncertainty. In this paper, we point out that the existing popular variance attenuation method highly overestimates aleatoric uncertainty. To address this issue, we propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Unified Risk View of Uncertainty: Posterior Risk for Disentanglement and Evaluation Beyond Proxies
A posterior-risk definition of uncertainty that subsumes Bayesian and frequentist views is used to build a semi-synthetic GP benchmark with exact oracle aleatoric and epistemic targets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.