Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Quantifying Barriers of Urban Mobility

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11343 v2 pith:6NNNEYQW submitted 2023-12-18 physics.soc-ph

classification physics.soc-ph
keywords mobilitybarriersurbanclustersnetworkadministrativeamenitiesarea
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Barriers in cities, such as administrative boundaries, natural obstacles, railways or major roads are thought to induce segregation. However, the empirical knowledge about this phenomenon is limited. Here, we present a network science framework to assess barriers to urban mobility along their hierarchy, across residential areas and visited amenities. Using GPS mobility data, we construct a network of blocks from the sequence of individual stays in a major European city. A community detection algorithm allows us to partition this network into non-overlapping areas of dense mobility clusters, in which the effect of transportation hubs can be tuned with a parameter. We apply the Symmetric Area Difference index to quantify the overlap between these mobility clusters and the polygons of urban area separated by barriers. Reducing the effect of transportation hubs results in smaller scale mobility clusters that fit better to lower rank administrative or road barriers compared to their higher rank pairs. We find that characteristic urban barriers can replace each other in dividing mobility clusters of different scales. Next, we define the Barrier Crossing Ratio, the fraction of barrier crossings that bridge mobility clusters. The decomposition of this indicator by origins and destinations suggests a significantly higher impact of barriers on those who live closer to the city center and smaller impact on visits to complex amenities. These results contribute to the ongoing discourse on urban segregation, emphasizing the importance of barriers to urban mobility in shaping interactions and mixing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multiscale patterns of migration flows in Austria: regionalization, administrative barriers, and urban-rural divides

    physics.soc-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Administrative boundaries in Austria act as migration barriers that standard gravity models systematically fail to capture.

  2. Beyond Distance: Mobility Neural Embeddings Reveal Visible and Invisible Barriers in Urban Space

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mobility embeddings trained on phone trajectories reveal that amenity placement, administrative borders, and income and race segregation, more than physical infrastructure, create behavioral barriers between nearby ur...

Pith tools