pith. sign in

arxiv: 2312.11704 · v2 · submitted 2023-12-18 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Ultralight dark matter in long-baseline accelerator neutrino oscillations

Xin-Qiang Li , Hai-Xing Lin , Jian Tang , Sampsa Vihonen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords ultralight dark matterneutrino oscillationsT2K experimentNOvA experimentstochastic fluctuationsCP-violating phasescalar interactionsvector interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultralight dark matter coupling limits from neutrino oscillations relax by an order of magnitude in the low-mass regime due to stochastic effects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how ultralight dark matter influences neutrino flavor oscillations in long-baseline experiments by incorporating stochastic fluctuations from the dark matter coherence into the analysis of T2K and NOvA data. It covers flavor-universal and flavor-general scalar interactions as well as specific vector interactions. In the low-mass regime below roughly 10 to the minus 17 electronvolts, where fluctuations are largest, the resulting constraints on the couplings become weaker by about a factor of ten than in the high-mass regime above 10 to the minus 15 electronvolts, where fluctuations average out. The combined datasets still produce meaningful exclusion regions on the interaction strengths. No statistically significant evidence emerges that the ultralight dark matter effects resolve the tension between the two experiments in the value of the CP-violating phase.

Core claim

In the low-mass regime, m_φ ≲ 10^{-17} eV, where stochastic effects are maximal, constraints on the ULDM couplings are relaxed by roughly an order of magnitude compared to those in the high-mass regime, m_φ ≳ 10^{-15} eV, where such fluctuations are effectively averaged out. While the combined T2K and NOνA datasets impose nontrivial exclusion limits on the ULDM interactions, we find no statistically significant evidence that these effects alleviate the current tension in determining the CP-violating phase δ_CP between the two experiments.

What carries the argument

Stochastic fluctuations from the coherence properties of ultralight dark matter, modeled and folded directly into the statistical likelihood for oscillation data across scalar and vector interaction types.

If this is right

  • Constraints on the ULDM couplings become roughly ten times weaker in the low-mass regime than in the high-mass regime.
  • The combined T2K and NOvA data still exclude nontrivial ranges of the scalar and vector interaction strengths.
  • Inclusion of the ultralight dark matter effects does not produce a statistically significant resolution of the existing tension in the preferred value of δ_CP.
  • Future high-precision neutrino facilities will be needed to probe the remaining allowed parameter space and achieve a definite measurement of δ_CP.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the stochastic modeling is accurate, similar order-of-magnitude relaxations could appear in other long-baseline or reactor neutrino datasets sensitive to the same mass window.
  • The absence of tension resolution suggests that ultralight dark matter of this type is unlikely to be the dominant source of the current experimental discrepancy in δ_CP.
  • Extending the same stochastic treatment to short-baseline experiments or to different interaction channels could test whether the relaxation pattern is universal across oscillation baselines.

Load-bearing premise

The coherence properties of the ultralight dark matter are correctly captured by modeling the resulting stochastic fluctuations and incorporating them directly into the statistical analysis of the oscillation data.

What would settle it

A re-analysis of the same T2K and NOvA datasets that yields comparable coupling limits in the low-mass and high-mass regimes, or that finds a statistically significant shift toward a common δ_CP value once the stochastic terms are included, would falsify the reported relaxation and lack of tension resolution.

read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of the ultralight dark matter (ULDM) effects on neutrino oscillations using the latest long-baseline data from the T2K and NO$\nu$A experiments. Our analysis covers both flavor-universal and flavor-general scalar interactions, as well as vector interactions associated with the $L_e - L_\mu$ and $L_\mu - L_\tau$ gauge symmetries. Importantly, we explicitly consider the coherence properties of the ULDM by incorporating the resulting stochastic fluctuations into our statistical analysis. We find that in the low-mass regime, $m_\phi \lesssim 10^{-17}$ eV, where stochastic effects are maximal, constraints on the ULDM couplings are relaxed by roughly an order of magnitude compared to those in the high-mass regime, $m_\phi \gtrsim 10^{-15}$ eV, where such fluctuations are effectively averaged out. While the combined T2K and NO$\nu$A datasets impose nontrivial exclusion limits on the ULDM interactions, we find no statistically significant evidence that these effects alleviate the current tension in determining the CP-violating phase $\delta_{CP}$ between the two experiments. It will be, therefore, essential for future high-precision facilities to further probe the ULDM scenarios and achieve a definite measurement of $\delta_{CP}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs a systematic analysis of ultralight dark matter (ULDM) effects on long-baseline neutrino oscillations, incorporating stochastic fluctuations from ULDM coherence into the statistical treatment of T2K and NOνA data. It distinguishes low-mass (m_φ ≲ 10^{-17} eV) and high-mass (m_φ ≳ 10^{-15} eV) regimes for both scalar and vector interactions, reporting that constraints on ULDM couplings relax by roughly an order of magnitude in the low-mass regime while finding no statistically significant relief of the δ_CP tension in the combined dataset.

Significance. If the statistical modeling of stochastic effects is robust, the work supplies concrete exclusion limits on ULDM-neutrino couplings and demonstrates that future high-precision experiments will be required to test these scenarios definitively. The explicit inclusion of coherence properties is a methodological strength that could be adopted more broadly in oscillation analyses.

major comments (2)
  1. [statistical analysis section] The joint T2K+NOνA likelihood construction in the low-mass regime (abstract and statistical analysis section): the coherence length at m_φ ≲ 10^{-17} eV exceeds the ~10^4 km baseline separation, implying that the stochastic phase/amplitude realization must be drawn once and shared between experiments. If independent realizations are instead sampled for each dataset, the effective parameter volume is artificially enlarged, which would bias the reported order-of-magnitude relaxation of coupling bounds and the assessment of δ_CP tension relief.
  2. [methods section on ULDM coherence] Validation of the stochastic fluctuation model (methods section on ULDM coherence): the paper states that fluctuations are incorporated directly into the oscillation probabilities, but no explicit test is shown confirming that the modeled variance matches the expected galactic-velocity coherence length scaling (∼ ħc/(m_φ v) with v∼10^{-3}c). This is load-bearing for the distinction between mass regimes.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the ULDM field and coupling constants is introduced without a dedicated table; a summary table of symbols, interaction Lagrangians, and mass-regime definitions would improve readability.
  2. The abstract quotes an 'order of magnitude' relaxation without citing the precise numerical factor or the coupling values at which the high-mass and low-mass limits cross; this should be stated explicitly with reference to the relevant figure or table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [statistical analysis section] The joint T2K+NOνA likelihood construction in the low-mass regime (abstract and statistical analysis section): the coherence length at m_φ ≲ 10^{-17} eV exceeds the ~10^4 km baseline separation, implying that the stochastic phase/amplitude realization must be drawn once and shared between experiments. If independent realizations are instead sampled for each dataset, the effective parameter volume is artificially enlarged, which would bias the reported order-of-magnitude relaxation of coupling bounds and the assessment of δ_CP tension relief.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that in the low-mass regime, where the coherence length exceeds the separation between the T2K and NOνA baselines, the stochastic realization of the ULDM field must be shared between the two experiments. Our implementation draws a single stochastic realization for the joint analysis, applying the same fluctuations to both datasets. We will revise the statistical analysis section to explicitly state this shared sampling procedure and confirm that independent realizations were not used. This clarification will not change the numerical results but addresses the concern about potential bias. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [methods section on ULDM coherence] Validation of the stochastic fluctuation model (methods section on ULDM coherence): the paper states that fluctuations are incorporated directly into the oscillation probabilities, but no explicit test is shown confirming that the modeled variance matches the expected galactic-velocity coherence length scaling (∼ ħc/(m_φ v) with v∼10^{-3}c). This is load-bearing for the distinction between mass regimes.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit validation test would strengthen the presentation. The stochastic model is derived from the standard coherence length scaling with galactic velocity v ∼ 10^{-3}c, and the variance is set accordingly for each mass regime. In the revised manuscript, we will add a validation subsection or figure in the methods section that explicitly compares the modeled fluctuation variance to the expected scaling across a range of m_φ values, confirming the low-mass and high-mass distinctions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external data

full rationale

The paper's central claims (relaxed ULDM bounds at low mass, no δ_CP tension relief) are obtained by fitting standard neutrino oscillation probabilities to external T2K/NOνA datasets while modeling stochastic fluctuations from ULDM coherence. No quoted equations or steps reduce a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, invoke self-citations as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or rename known results. The analysis treats external data as independent benchmarks, satisfying the self-contained criterion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard neutrino oscillation formalism plus the modeling choice that stochastic fluctuations from ULDM coherence can be treated statistically; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the ULDM couplings being constrained, and no invented entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • ULDM coupling strengths
    The scalar and vector couplings are the quantities being bounded by the data fits in each mass regime.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stochastic fluctuations arising from ULDM coherence can be incorporated into the oscillation probability and likelihood analysis without additional unaccounted systematics.
    This assumption underpins the reported difference between low-mass and high-mass regimes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5773 in / 1347 out tokens · 32442 ms · 2026-05-24T05:01:06.629619+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effective Matter Flavor Conversion Mediated by Pseudo-Sterile States as the Possible Origin of Neutrino Oscillation Anomalies

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A sterile neutrino with a novel density-dependent matter potential Vs resolves multiple oscillation anomalies when Vs is negative and mixing angles are small.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov,Cold and fuzzy dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 1158–1161, [astro-ph/0003365]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/, Astrophys. J. 238 (1980) 471

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Weak Gravitational Lensing

    M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider,Weak gravitational lensing, Phys. Rept. 340 (2001) 291–472, [astro-ph/9912508]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    SDSS Collaboration, D. J. Eisenstein et al.,Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 633 (2005) 560–574, [astro-ph/0501171]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    WMAP Collaboration, G. Hinshaw et al.,Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208 (2013) 19, [arXiv:1212.5226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Supersymmetric Dark Matter

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195–373, [hep-ph/9506380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    LUX Collaboration, D. S. Akerib et al.,First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303, [arXiv:1310.8214]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment

    PandaX-II Collaboration, X. Cui et al.,Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017), no. 18 181302, [arXiv:1708.06917]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370 (1994) 629

    B. Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370 (1994) 629

    work page 1994

  11. [11]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 8 083504, [arXiv:1607.06077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

    work page 1977

  13. [13]

    Oks,Brief review of recent advances in understanding dark matter and dark energy, New Astron

    E. Oks,Brief review of recent advances in understanding dark matter and dark energy, New Astron. Rev.93 (2021) 101632, [arXiv:2111.00363]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,

    D. Antypas et al.,New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter, arXiv:2203.14915

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Davoudiasl, P

    H. Davoudiasl, P. B. Denton, and J. Gehrlein,Supermassive Black Holes, Ultralight Dark Matter, and Gravitational Waves from a First Order Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022), no. 8 081101, [arXiv:2109.01678]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Dark Matter with Stuckelberg Axions

    C. Corianò, P. H. Frampton, N. Irges, and A. Tatullo,Dark Matter with Stückelberg Axions, Front. in Phys.7 (2019) 36, [arXiv:1811.05792]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    B. T. Chiang, J. P. Ostriker, and H.-Y. Schive,Can ultralight dark matter explain the age-velocity dispersion relation of the Milky Way disc: A revised and improved treatment, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518 (2023), no. 3 4045, [arXiv:2211.07452]. – 17 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Distorted Neutrino Oscillations From Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter

    G. Krnjaic, P. A. N. Machado, and L. Necib,Distorted neutrino oscillations from time varying cosmic fields, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 7 075017, [arXiv:1705.06740]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Fuzzy Dark Matter and Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions

    V. Brdar, J. Kopp, J. Liu, P. Prass, and X.-P. Wang,Fuzzy dark matter and nonstandard neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 4 043001, [arXiv:1705.09455]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    J. Liao, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant,Light scalar dark matter at neutrino oscillation experiments, JHEP 04 (2018) 136, [arXiv:1803.01773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    K.-Y. Choi, J. Kim, and C. Rott,Constraining dark matter-neutrino interactions with IceCube-170922A, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 8 083018, [arXiv:1903.03302]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Losada, Y

    M. Losada, Y. Nir, G. Perez, I. Savoray, and Y. Shpilman,Parametric resonance in neutrino oscillations induced by ultra-light dark matter and implications for KamLAND and JUNO, JHEP 03 (2023) 032, [arXiv:2205.09769]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Cordero, L

    R. Cordero, L. A. Delgadillo, and O. G. Miranda,European Spallation Source as a searching tool for an ultralight scalar field, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023), no. 7 075023, [arXiv:2207.11308]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    A. Dev, P. A. N. Machado, and P. Martínez-Miravé,Signatures of ultralight dark matter in neutrino oscillation experiments, JHEP 01 (2021) 094, [arXiv:2007.03590]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Losada, Y

    M. Losada, Y. Nir, G. Perez, and Y. Shpilman,Probing scalar dark matter oscillations with neutrino oscillations, JHEP 04 (2022) 030, [arXiv:2107.10865]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Losada, Y

    M. Losada, Y. Nir, G. Perez, I. Savoray, and Y. Shpilman,Time dependent CP-even and CP-odd signatures of scalar ultralight dark matter in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 5 055004, [arXiv:2302.00005]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Neutrinophilic Axion-Like Dark Matter

    G.-Y. Huang and N. Nath,Neutrinophilic Axion-Like Dark Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018), no. 11 922, [arXiv:1809.01111]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Brzeminski, S

    D. Brzeminski, S. Das, A. Hook, and C. Ristow,Constraining Vector Dark Matter with neutrino experiments, JHEP 08 (2023) 181, [arXiv:2212.05073]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Gherghetta and A

    T. Gherghetta and A. Shkerin,Probing a local dark matter halo with neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 9 095009, [arXiv:2305.06441]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    C. A. Argüelles, K. Farrag, and T. Katori,Ultra-light Dark Matter Limits from Astrophysical Neutrino Flavour, PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 1415

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Y. Chen, X. Xue, and V. Cardoso,Black Holes as Neutrino Factories, arXiv:2308.00741

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Abe et al.,Updated T2K measurements of muon neutrino and antineutrino disappearance using 3.6×1021 protons on target, Phys

    T2K Collaboration, K. Abe et al.,Updated T2K measurements of muon neutrino and antineutrino disappearance using 3.6×1021 protons on target, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 7 072011, [arXiv:2305.09916]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    NOvA Collaboration, M. A. Acero et al.,Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 3 032004, [arXiv:2108.08219]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Cherchiglia, P

    A. Cherchiglia, P. Pasquini, O. L. G. Peres, F. F. Rodrigues, R. R. Rossi, and E. S. Souza, Alleviating the present tension between T2K and NOνA with neutrino New Physics at source, arXiv:2310.18401

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Capozzi, S

    F. Capozzi, S. S. Chatterjee, and A. Palazzo,Neutrino Mass Ordering Obscured by Nonstandard Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020), no. 11 111801, [arXiv:1908.06992]. – 18 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo,Interpretation of NOνA and T2K data in the presence of a light sterile neutrino, arXiv:2005.10338

    work page arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    P. B. Denton, J. Gehrlein, and R. Pestes,CP -Violating Neutrino Nonstandard Interactions in Long-Baseline-Accelerator Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 5 051801, [arXiv:2008.01110]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    S. S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo,Nonstandard Neutrino Interactions as a Solution to the N OνA and T2K Discrepancy, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 5 051802, [arXiv:2008.04161]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    H.-X. Lin, J. Tang, S. Vihonen, and P. Pasquini,Nonminimal Lorentz invariance violation in light of the muon anomalous magnetic moment and long-baseline neutrino oscillation data, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 9 096029, [arXiv:2111.14336]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Rahaman,Looking for Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the latest long baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation data, Eur

    U. Rahaman,Looking for Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the latest long baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation data, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021), no. 9 792, [arXiv:2103.04576]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    A. E. Nelson and J. Scholtz,Dark Light, Dark Matter and the Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 103501, [arXiv:1105.2812]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    WISPy Cold Dark Matter

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald,WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP 06 (2012) 013, [arXiv:1201.5902]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Neutrino Oscillations as a Probe of Light Scalar Dark Matter

    A. Berlin,Neutrino Oscillations as a Probe of Light Scalar Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 23 231801, [arXiv:1608.01307]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES

    P. Huber, M. Lindner, and W. Winter,Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator), Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195, [hep-ph/0407333]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0

    P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, and W. Winter,New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator, Comput. Phys. Commun.177 (2007) 432–438, [hep-ph/0701187]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  46. [46]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09 (2020) 178, [arXiv:2007.14792]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Nufit 5.2

    NuFIT Collaboration, I. Esteban et al., “Nufit 5.2.” http://www.nu-fit.org/?q=node/256, 2022

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Solar Neutrinos as a Probe of Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions

    F. Capozzi, I. M. Shoemaker, and L. Vecchi,Solar Neutrinos as a Probe of Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions, JCAP 07 (2017) 021, [arXiv:1702.08464]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors

    M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby, and M. Teo,Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 3 035019, [arXiv:1704.05081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    M. B. Wise and Y. Zhang,Lepton Flavorful Fifth Force and Depth-dependent Neutrino Matter Interactions, JHEP 06 (2018) 053, [arXiv:1803.00591]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Coloma, M

    P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and M. Maltoni,Neutrino oscillation constraints on U(1)’ models: from non-standard interactions to long-range forces, JHEP 01 (2021) 114, [arXiv:2009.14220]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 115 (2022)]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    J. Z. Chen, I. M. Oldengott, G. Pierobon, and Y. Y. Y. Wong,Weaker yet again: mass – 19 – spectrum-consistent cosmological constraints on the neutrino lifetime, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022), no. 7 640, [arXiv:2203.09075]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance

    S. Schlamminger, K. Y. Choi, T. A. Wagner, J. H. Gundlach, and E. G. Adelberger,Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 041101, [arXiv:0712.0607]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    Ekhterachian, A

    M. Ekhterachian, A. Hook, S. Kumar, and Y. Tsai,Bounds on gauge bosons coupled to nonconserved currents, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), no. 3 035034, [arXiv:2103.13396]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    J. A. Dror, R. Laha, and T. Opferkuch,Probing muonic forces with neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 2 023005, [arXiv:1909.12845]. – 20 –

    work page arXiv 2020