Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels

Machine Learning · Submitted 20 Dec 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2312.12937 (version 2)
Pith IDHYIZO2YH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJonathan Wilton, Nan Ye. "Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labels." arXiv:2312.12937 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/HYIZO2YH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,093 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.37 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider training decision trees using noisily labeled data, focusing on loss functions that can lead to robust learning algorithms. Our contributions are threefold. First, we offer novel theoretical insights on the robustness of many existing loss functions in the context of decision tree learning. We show that some of the losses belong to a class of what we call conservative losses, and the conservative losses lead to an early stopping behavior during training and noise-tolerant predictions during testing. Second, we introduce a framework for constructing robust loss functions, called distribution losses. These losses apply percentile-based penalties based on an assumed margin distribution, and they naturally allow adapting to different noise rates via a robustness parameter. In particular, we introduce a new loss called the negative exponential loss, which leads to an efficient greedy impurity-reduction learning algorithm. Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider training decision trees using noisily labeled data, focusing on loss functions that can lead to robust learning algorithms. background 0.97 0.27 0.05 asserted 0.68
s1 Our contributions are threefold. contribution 0.99 0.56 0.02 asserted 0.76
s2 First, we offer novel theoretical insights on the robustness of many existing loss functions in the context of decision tree learning. contribution 1.00 0.88 0.07 asserted 0.98
s3 We show that some of the losses belong to a class of what we call conservative losses, and the conservative losses lead to an early stopping behavior during training and noise-tolerant predictions during testing. result 0.64 0.90 0.23 asserted 1.00
s4 Second, we introduce a framework for constructing robust loss functions, called distribution losses. contribution 0.99 0.95 0.06 asserted 1.00
s5 These losses apply percentile-based penalties based on an assumed margin distribution, and they naturally allow adapting to different noise rates via a robustness parameter. method 0.69 0.81 0.07 asserted 0.99
s6 In particular, we introduce a new loss called the negative exponential loss, which leads to an efficient greedy impurity-reduction learning algorithm. contribution 0.92 0.94 0.09 asserted 1.00
s7 Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss. result 0.58 0.97 0.64 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.98 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.88.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider training decision trees using noisily labeled data, focusing on loss functions that can lead to robust learning algorithms. Our contributions are threefold. First, we offer novel theoretical insights on the robustness of many existing loss functions in the context of decision tree learning. We show that some of the losses belong to a class of what we call conservative losses, and the conservative losses lead to an early stopping behavior during training and noise-tolerant predictions during testing. Second, we introduce a framework for constructing robust loss functions, called distribution losses. These losses apply percentile-based penalties based on an assumed margin distribution, and they naturally allow adapting to different noise rates via a robustness parameter. In particular, we introduce a new loss called the negative exponential loss, which leads to an efficient greedy impurity-reduction learning algorithm. Lastly, our experiments on multiple datasets and noise settings validate our theoretical insight and the effectiveness of our adaptive negative exponential loss.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.