REVIEW 9 cited by
ASSISTGUI: Task-Oriented Desktop Graphical User Interface Automation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ASSISTGUI: Task-Oriented Desktop Graphical User Interface Automation
read the original abstract
Graphical User Interface (GUI) automation holds significant promise for assisting users with complex tasks, thereby boosting human productivity. Existing works leveraging Large Language Model (LLM) or LLM-based AI agents have shown capabilities in automating tasks on Android and Web platforms. However, these tasks are primarily aimed at simple device usage and entertainment operations. This paper presents a novel benchmark, AssistGUI, to evaluate whether models are capable of manipulating the mouse and keyboard on the Windows platform in response to user-requested tasks. We carefully collected a set of 100 tasks from nine widely-used software applications, such as, After Effects and MS Word, each accompanied by the necessary project files for better evaluation. Moreover, we propose an advanced Actor-Critic Embodied Agent framework, which incorporates a sophisticated GUI parser driven by an LLM-agent and an enhanced reasoning mechanism adept at handling lengthy procedural tasks. Our experimental results reveal that our GUI Parser and Reasoning mechanism outshine existing methods in performance. Nevertheless, the potential remains substantial, with the best model attaining only a 46% success rate on our benchmark. We conclude with a thorough analysis of the current methods' limitations, setting the stage for future breakthroughs in this domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
-
A Comprehensive Study of Implementation Bugs in Multi-modal Agents
First systematic taxonomy of 158 multi-modal agent bugs plus a runtime analyzer that recovers most open issues and surfaces 31 new ones.
-
AndroidDaily: A Verifiable Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents on Real-World Closed-Source Applications
AndroidDaily supplies 350 verifiable tasks on 94 closed-source Android apps evaluated by GRADE (87.37% human agreement), with the strongest model achieving 62% success.
-
AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents
AndroidWorld is a dynamic, reproducible Android benchmark that generates unlimited natural-language tasks for autonomous agents and shows current agents succeed on only 30.6 percent of them.
-
GameWorld: Towards Standardized and Verifiable Evaluation of Multimodal Game Agents
GameWorld is a new benchmark providing standardized interfaces, 34 games, 170 tasks, and verifiable outcome metrics to evaluate multimodal large language model agents in video game environments.
-
LogiDroid: Individual Functional Test Generation via Business Logic Extraction and Adaptation
LogiDroid generates functional Android test cases with verification assertions by retrieving similar test cases, fusing their business logic, and adapting it to the target app's real-time GUI state.
-
OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agents
OS-Atlas, trained on the largest open-source cross-platform GUI grounding corpus of 13 million elements, outperforms prior open-source models on six benchmarks across mobile, desktop, and web platforms.
-
SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agents
SeeClick improves visual GUI agents via GUI grounding pre-training on automatically curated data and introduces the ScreenSpot benchmark, with results indicating that stronger grounding boosts downstream task performance.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Agents for Computer Use: Foundations, Challenges, and Future Directions
A survey of 87 agents for computer use and 33 datasets that introduces a three-dimensional taxonomy across domain, interaction, and agent perspectives and identifies six research gaps.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.