Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Considering a superposition of classical reference frames

Quantum Physics · Submitted 21 Dec 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated.

how it is stated · asserted 0.94 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2312.13540 (version 1)
Pith IDRBGPMJS4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEdmund Mbadu, Elliott Tammaro, Hunter Angle. "Considering a superposition of classical reference frames." arXiv:2312.13540 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/RBGPMJS4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,507 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A ubiquitous feature of quantum mechanical theories is the existence of states of superposition. This is expected to be no different for a quantum gravity theory. Guided by this consideration and others we consider a framework in which classical reference frames may be in superposition relative to one another. Mirroring standard quantum mechanics we introduce a complex-valued wavefunctional, which takes as input the transformations between the coordinates, $\Psi[x(x')]$, with the interpretation that an interaction between the reference frames may select a particular transformation with probability distribution given by the Born rule - $P[x(x')] = \text{probability distribution functional} \equiv \vert \Psi[x(x')] \vert^2$. The cases of two and three reference frames in superposition are considered explicitly. It is shown that the set of transformations is closed. A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A ubiquitous feature of quantum mechanical theories is the existence of states of superposition. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 This is expected to be no different for a quantum gravity theory. background 1.00 0.06 0.04 hedged possibility 0.63
s2 Guided by this consideration and others we consider a framework in which classical reference frames may be in superposition relative to one another. contribution 0.97 0.87 0.13 asserted 0.49
s3 Mirroring standard quantum mechanics we introduce a complex-valued wavefunctional, which takes as input the transformations between the coordinates, $\Psi[x(x')]$, with the interpretation that an interaction between the reference frames may select a particular transformation with probability distribution given by the Born rule - $P[x(x')] = \text{probability distribution functional} \equiv \vert \Psi[x(x')] \vert^2$. method 0.86 0.88 0.12 asserted 0.93
s4 The cases of two and three reference frames in superposition are considered explicitly. contribution 0.87 0.92 0.07 asserted 0.94
s5 It is shown that the set of transformations is closed. result 0.99 0.90 0.14 asserted 1.00
s6 A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated. contribution 0.55 0.92 0.32 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.93 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A ubiquitous feature of quantum mechanical theories is the existence of states of superposition. This is expected to be no different for a quantum gravity theory. Guided by this consideration and others we consider a framework in which classical reference frames may be in superposition relative to one another. Mirroring standard quantum mechanics we introduce a complex-valued wavefunctional, which takes as input the transformations between the coordinates, $\Psi[x(x')]$, with the interpretation that an interaction between the reference frames may select a particular transformation with probability distribution given by the Born rule - $P[x(x')] = \text{probability distribution functional} \equiv \vert \Psi[x(x')] \vert^2$. The cases of two and three reference frames in superposition are considered explicitly. It is shown that the set of transformations is closed. A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.