Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Manipulating Trajectory Prediction with Backdoors

Machine Learning · Submitted 21 Dec 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In other words, the model has good benign performance but is vulnerable to backdoors.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2312.13863 (version 2)
Pith IDFUSK253A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlexandre Alahi, Kaouther Messaoud, Kathrin Grosse, Matthieu Cord, Mickael Chen, Patrick P\'erez. "Manipulating Trajectory Prediction with Backdoors." arXiv:2312.13863 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/FUSK253A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,357 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.29 · states limitation 0.83 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.29 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Autonomous vehicles ought to predict the surrounding agents' trajectories to allow safe maneuvers in uncertain and complex traffic situations. As companies increasingly apply trajectory prediction in the real world, security becomes a relevant concern. In this paper, we focus on backdoors - a security threat acknowledged in other fields but so far overlooked for trajectory prediction. To this end, we describe and investigate four triggers that could affect trajectory prediction. We then show that these triggers (for example, a braking vehicle), when correlated with a desired output (for example, a curve) during training, cause the desired output of a state-of-the-art trajectory prediction model. In other words, the model has good benign performance but is vulnerable to backdoors. This is the case even if the trigger maneuver is performed by a non-casual agent behind the target vehicle. As a side-effect, our analysis reveals interesting limitations within trajectory prediction models. Finally, we evaluate a range of defenses against backdoors. While some, like simple offroad checks, do not enable detection for all triggers, clustering is a promising candidate to support manual inspection to find backdoors.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Autonomous vehicles ought to predict the surrounding agents' trajectories to allow safe maneuvers in uncertain and complex traffic situations. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.69
s1 As companies increasingly apply trajectory prediction in the real world, security becomes a relevant concern. background 0.99 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.96
s2 In this paper, we focus on backdoors - a security threat acknowledged in other fields but so far overlooked for trajectory prediction. gap 0.90 0.13 0.04 asserted 0.99
s3 To this end, we describe and investigate four triggers that could affect trajectory prediction. contribution 0.77 0.86 0.03 hedged possibility 0.55
s4 We then show that these triggers (for example, a braking vehicle), when correlated with a desired output (for example, a curve) during training, cause the desired output of a state-of-the-art trajectory prediction model. result 0.92 0.94 0.35 asserted 1.00
s5 In other words, the model has good benign performance but is vulnerable to backdoors. result 0.61 0.89 0.50 asserted 1.00
s6 This is the case even if the trigger maneuver is performed by a non-casual agent behind the target vehicle. result 0.96 0.84 0.07 asserted 1.00
s7 As a side-effect, our analysis reveals interesting limitations within trajectory prediction models. result 0.78 0.91 0.04 asserted 0.96
s8 Finally, we evaluate a range of defenses against backdoors. contribution 0.68 0.94 0.04 asserted 0.94
s9 While some, like simple offroad checks, do not enable detection for all triggers, clustering is a promising candidate to support manual inspection to find backdoors. result 0.96 0.91 0.23 hedged possibility 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.94 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Autonomous vehicles ought to predict the surrounding agents' trajectories to allow safe maneuvers in uncertain and complex traffic situations. As companies increasingly apply trajectory prediction in the real world, security becomes a relevant concern. In this paper, we focus on backdoors - a security threat acknowledged in other fields but so far overlooked for trajectory prediction. To this end, we describe and investigate four triggers that could affect trajectory prediction. We then show that these triggers (for example, a braking vehicle), when correlated with a desired output (for example, a curve) during training, cause the desired output of a state-of-the-art trajectory prediction model. In other words, the model has good benign performance but is vulnerable to backdoors. This is the case even if the trigger maneuver is performed by a non-casual agent behind the target vehicle. As a side-effect, our analysis reveals interesting limitations within trajectory prediction models. Finally, we evaluate a range of defenses against backdoors. While some, like simple offroad checks, do not enable detection for all triggers, clustering is a promising candidate to support manual inspection to find backdoors.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.