REVIEW 2 cited by
DP-AdamBC: Your DP-Adam Is Actually DP-SGD (Unless You Apply Bias Correction)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The Adam optimizer is a popular choice in contemporary deep learning, due to its strong empirical performance. However we observe that in privacy sensitive scenarios, the traditional use of Differential Privacy (DP) with the Adam optimizer leads to sub-optimal performance on several tasks. We find that this performance degradation is due to a DP bias in Adam's second moment estimator, introduced by the addition of independent noise in the gradient computation to enforce DP guarantees. This DP bias leads to a different scaling for low variance parameter updates, that is inconsistent with the behavior of non-private Adam. We propose DP-AdamBC, an optimization algorithm which removes the bias in the second moment estimation and retrieves the expected behaviour of Adam. Empirically, DP-AdamBC significantly improves the optimization performance of DP-Adam by up to 3.5% in final accuracy in image, text, and graph node classification tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the Performance of Differentially Private Optimization with Heavy-Tail Class Imbalance
Under heavy-tail class imbalance, subtracting the DP noise variance from Adam's second moment (DP-AdamBC) substantially improves learning of rare classes compared with DP gradient descent.
-
On Design Principles for Private Adaptive Optimizers
A theoretical and empirical study finds that unbiased second-moment estimates in private Adam can be harmful in high dimensions, and that scale-then-privatize outperforms the alternatives on a small transformer task.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.