Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Knowledge Distillation of LLM for Automatic Scoring of Science Education Assessments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.15842 v3 pith:6HIT5EG5 submitted 2023-12-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelmodelsteacheraccuracyneuralscoringsmallerstudent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study proposes a method for knowledge distillation (KD) of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) into smaller, more efficient, and accurate neural networks. We specifically target the challenge of deploying these models on resource-constrained devices. Our methodology involves training the smaller student model (Neural Network) using the prediction probabilities (as soft labels) of the LLM, which serves as a teacher model. This is achieved through a specialized loss function tailored to learn from the LLM's output probabilities, ensuring that the student model closely mimics the teacher's performance. To validate the performance of the KD approach, we utilized a large dataset, 7T, containing 6,684 student-written responses to science questions and three mathematical reasoning datasets with student-written responses graded by human experts. We compared accuracy with state-of-the-art (SOTA) distilled models, TinyBERT, and artificial neural network (ANN) models. Results have shown that the KD approach has 3% and 2% higher scoring accuracy than ANN and TinyBERT, respectively, and comparable accuracy to the teacher model. Furthermore, the student model size is 0.03M, 4,000 times smaller in parameters and x10 faster in inferencing than the teacher model and TinyBERT, respectively. The significance of this research lies in its potential to make advanced AI technologies accessible in typical educational settings, particularly for automatic scoring.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PRvL: Quantifying the Capabilities and Risks of Large Language Models for PII Redaction

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Instruction-tuned open-source LLMs, especially DeepSeek-Q1, outperform fine-tuned, RAG, and NER baselines on PII redaction accuracy and leakage in this benchmark.

Pith tools