Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Sensitivity analysis for causality in observational studies for regulatory science

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.03176 v2 pith:23RT5PFA submitted 2023-10-04 stat.AP

Sensitivity analysis for causality in observational studies for regulatory science

classification stat.AP
keywords regulatoryanalysissensitivitycausalroadmapdatameetingobservational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recognizing the importance of real-world data (RWD) for regulatory purposes, the United States (US) Congress passed the 21st Century Cures Act1 mandating the development of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on regulatory use of real-world evidence. The Forum on the Integration of Observational and Randomized Data (FIORD) conducted a meeting bringing together various stakeholder groups to build consensus around best practices for the use of RWD to support regulatory science. Our companion paper describes in detail the context and discussion carried out in the meeting, which includes a recommendation to use a causal roadmap for complete pre-specification of study designs using RWD. This article discusses one step of the roadmap: the specification of a procedure for sensitivity analysis, defined as a procedure for testing the robustness of substantive conclusions to violations of assumptions made in the causal roadmap. We include a worked-out example of a sensitivity analysis from a RWD study on the effectiveness of Nifurtimox in treating Chagas disease, as well as an overview of various methods available for sensitivity analysis in causal inference, emphasizing practical considerations on their use for regulatory purposes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.