REVIEW 2 cited by
Excitonic Instability in Ta2Pd3Te5 Monolayer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
By systematic theoretical calculations, we have revealed an excitonic insulator (EI) in the Ta2Pd3Te5 monolayer. The bulk Ta2Pd3Te5 is a van der Waals (vdW) layered compound, whereas the vdW layer can be obtained through exfoliation or molecular-beam epitaxy. First-principles calculations show that the monolayer is a nearly zero-gap semiconductor with the modified Becke-Johnson functional. Due to the same symmetry of the band-edge states, the two-dimensional polarization $\alpha_{2D}$ would be finite as the band gap goes to zero, allowing for an EI state in the compound. Using the first-principles many-body perturbation theory, the GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculation reveals that the exciton binding energy is larger than the single-particle band gap, indicating the excitonic instability. The computed phonon spectrum suggests that the monolayer is dynamically stable without lattice distortion. Our findings suggest that the Ta2Pd3Te5 monolayer is an excitonic insulator without structural distortion.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Unusual Electron-Phonon Interactions in Highly Anisotropic Two-Dimensional $Ta_2$$Ni_3$$Te_5$
Angle-resolved Raman spectroscopy and density functional perturbation theory trace unusual four-fold Ag-mode polarization patterns in Ta2Ni3Te5 to anisotropic electron-phonon interactions.
-
Diverse edge states of nanoribbons and excitonic insulator states of the monolayer Ta2Ni3Te5
First-principles calculations predict tunable electronic and magnetic edge states in Ta2Ni3Te5 nanoribbons, and claim the monolayer is an excitonic insulator because model exciton binding exceeds the assumed gap.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.