Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing Contrastive Learning with Efficient Combinatorial Positive Pairing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.05730 v1 pith:MCEPMF7G submitted 2024-01-11 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords learningviewscontrastiveecppmulti-viewperformancecombinatorialefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In the past few years, contrastive learning has played a central role for the success of visual unsupervised representation learning. Around the same time, high-performance non-contrastive learning methods have been developed as well. While most of the works utilize only two views, we carefully review the existing multi-view methods and propose a general multi-view strategy that can improve learning speed and performance of any contrastive or non-contrastive method. We first analyze CMC's full-graph paradigm and empirically show that the learning speed of $K$-views can be increased by $_{K}\mathrm{C}_{2}$ times for small learning rate and early training. Then, we upgrade CMC's full-graph by mixing views created by a crop-only augmentation, adopting small-size views as in SwAV multi-crop, and modifying the negative sampling. The resulting multi-view strategy is called ECPP (Efficient Combinatorial Positive Pairing). We investigate the effectiveness of ECPP by applying it to SimCLR and assessing the linear evaluation performance for CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-100. For each benchmark, we achieve a state-of-the-art performance. In case of ImageNet-100, ECPP boosted SimCLR outperforms supervised learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scientific Hypothesis Generation and Validation: Methods, Datasets, and Future Directions

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM-based hypothesis generation and validation whose taxonomy is useful in outline but whose citations and tool descriptions are unreliable.

Pith tools