Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revisiting Silhouette Aggregation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.05831 v3 pith:EDNXWROQ submitted 2024-01-11 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords clusteringstrategyaverageclusterdatasetimbalancemeasurequality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Silhouette coefficient is an established internal clustering evaluation measure that produces a score per data point, assessing the quality of its clustering assignment. To assess the quality of the clustering of the whole dataset, the scores of all the points in the dataset are typically (micro) averaged into a single value. An alternative path, however, that is rarely employed, is to average first at the cluster level and then (macro) average across clusters. As we illustrate in this work with a synthetic example, the typical micro-averaging strategy is sensitive to cluster imbalance while the overlooked macro-averaging strategy is far more robust. By investigating macro-Silhouette further, we find that uniform sub-sampling, the only available strategy in existing libraries, harms the measure's robustness against imbalance. We address this issue by proposing a per-cluster sampling method. An experimental study on eight real-world datasets is then used to analyse both coefficients in two clustering tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Formal and Empirical Study of Metadata-Based Profiling for Resource Management in the Computing Continuum

    cs.DC 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    PolarisProfiler groups historical workloads by runtime behavior and classifies new workloads by static metadata, estimating resource usage with reported normalized error below 50% for 93% of tested Alibaba workloads.

Pith tools