REVIEW 1 cited by
MiTTenS: A Dataset for Evaluating Gender Mistranslation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Translation systems, including foundation models capable of translation, can produce errors that result in gender mistranslation, and such errors can be especially harmful. To measure the extent of such potential harms when translating into and out of English, we introduce a dataset, MiTTenS, covering 26 languages from a variety of language families and scripts, including several traditionally under-represented in digital resources. The dataset is constructed with handcrafted passages that target known failure patterns, longer synthetically generated passages, and natural passages sourced from multiple domains. We demonstrate the usefulness of the dataset by evaluating both neural machine translation systems and foundation models, and show that all systems exhibit gender mistranslation and potential harm, even in high resource languages.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translation
An evaluation of 240 English-to-Greek translations shows Google Translate and DeepL exhibit persistent male bias, while a prompted GPT-4o can generate gender-inclusive alternatives for ambiguous sentences.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.