Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Passive particle in an active bath: How can we tell it is out of equilibrium?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07630 v1 pith:W6D3JGKN submitted 2024-01-15 cond-mat.soft

Passive particle in an active bath: How can we tell it is out of equilibrium?

classification cond-mat.soft
keywords probeactivenon-equilibriumdissipationequilibriumfluctuationfluidparticles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study a passive probe immersed in a fluid of active particles. Despite the system's non-equilibrium nature, the trajectory of the probe does not exhibit non-equilibrium signatures: its velocity distribution remains Gaussian, the second fluctuation dissipation theorem is not fundamentally violated, and the motion does not indicate breaking of time reversal symmetry. To tell that the probe is out of equilibrium requires examination of its behavior in tandem with that of the active fluid: the kinetic temperature of the probe does not equilibrate to that of the surrounding active particles. As a strategy to diagnose non-equilibrium from probe trajectories alone, we propose to examine their response to a small perturbation which reveals a non-equilibrium signature through a violation of the first fluctuation dissipation theorem.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.