REVIEW 1 cited by
Uncertainty estimates for semantic segmentation: providing enhanced reliability for automated motor claims handling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep neural network models for image segmentation can be a powerful tool for the automation of motor claims handling processes in the insurance industry. A crucial aspect is the reliability of the model outputs when facing adverse conditions, such as low quality photos taken by claimants to document damages. We explore the use of a meta-classification model to empirically assess the precision of segments predicted by a model trained for the semantic segmentation of car body parts. Different sets of features correlated with the quality of a segment are compared, and an AUROC score of 0.915 is achieved for distinguishing between high- and low-quality segments. By removing low-quality segments, the average mIoU of the segmentation output is improved by 16 percentage points and the number of wrongly predicted segments is reduced by 77%.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
GLIMPSE: Holistic Cross-Modal Explainability for Large Vision-Language Models
A gradient-attention explainability method produces sequence-level visual and textual saliency maps for free-form answers from large vision-language models, with stronger human-attention alignment and faithfulness tha...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.