Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Foundation Models in Federated Learning: Assessing Backdoor Vulnerabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.10375 v3 pith:VUUNLLLG submitted 2024-01-18 cs.CR cs.DCcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.DCcs.LG
keywords datasetslearningattackbackdoordatafederatedfoundationmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL), a privacy-preserving machine learning framework, faces significant data-related challenges. For example, the lack of suitable public datasets leads to ineffective information exchange, especially in heterogeneous environments with uneven data distribution. Foundation Models (FMs) offer a promising solution by generating synthetic datasets that mimic client data distributions, aiding model initialization and knowledge sharing among clients. However, the interaction between FMs and FL introduces new attack vectors that remain largely unexplored. This work therefore assesses the backdoor vulnerabilities exploiting FMs, where attackers exploit safety issues in FMs and poison synthetic datasets to compromise the entire system. Unlike traditional attacks, these new threats are characterized by their one-time, external nature, requiring minimal involvement in FL training. Given these uniqueness, current FL defense strategies provide limited robustness against this novel attack approach. Extensive experiments across image and text domains reveal the high susceptibility of FL to these novel threats, emphasizing the urgent need for enhanced security measures in FL in the era of FMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Poison Once, Refuse Forever: Weaponizing Alignment for Injecting Bias in LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 'subversive alignment injection' attack teaches aligned LLMs to refuse benign prompts on attacker-chosen topics, creating bias (ΔDP up to 38%) across chat and resume tasks with as little as 0.1-1% poisoned data.

  2. Federated Large Language Models: Feasibility, Robustness, Security and Future Directions

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of federated large language models that organizes current methods into feasibility, robustness, security, and future research directions.

Pith tools