The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2401.11082 · v2 · pith:7GNUGTN6 · submitted 2024-01-20 · astro-ph.EP

JWST observations of K2-18b can be explained by a gas-rich mini-Neptune with no habitable surface

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:7GNUGTN6record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords hyceanatmospheredatajwstk2-18bmini-neptunebecausegas-rich
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

JWST recently measured the transmission spectrum of K2-18b, a habitable-zone sub-Neptune exoplanet, detecting CH$_4$ and CO$_2$ in its atmosphere. The discovery paper argued the data are best explained by a habitable "Hycean" world, consisting of a relatively thin H$_2$-dominated atmosphere overlying a liquid water ocean. Here, we use photochemical and climate models to simulate K2-18b as both a Hycean planet and a gas-rich mini-Neptune with no defined surface. We find that a lifeless Hycean world is hard to reconcile with the JWST observations because photochemistry only supports $< 1$ part-per-million CH$_4$ in such an atmosphere while the data suggest about $\sim 1\%$ of the gas is present. Sustaining %-level CH$_4$ on a Hycean K2-18b may require the presence of a methane-producing biosphere, similar to microbial life on Earth $\sim 3$ billion years ago. On the other hand, we predict that a gas-rich mini-Neptune with $100 \times$ solar metallicity should have 4% CH$_4$ and nearly 0.1% CO$_2$, which are compatible with the JWST data. The CH$_4$ and CO$_2$ are produced thermochemically in the deep atmosphere and mixed upward to the low pressures sensitive to transmission spectroscopy. The model predicts H$_2$O, NH$_3$ and CO abundances broadly consistent with the non-detections. Given the additional obstacles to maintaining a stable temperate climate on Hycean worlds due to H$_2$ escape and potential supercriticality at depth, we favor the mini-Neptune interpretation because of its relative simplicity and because it does not need a biosphere or other unknown source of methane to explain the data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A generalised microbial cell model for methane biosignature predictions

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A diffusion-limited microbial cell model predicts that smaller, longer-lived methanogens produce stronger methane biosignatures, and competition should drive alien life toward these traits.

  2. A Hycean Interpretation of K2-18b Supported by Photochemical Atmospheric Compositional

    astro-ph.EP 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Hycean models with a 1-bar H2 envelope, percent-level CH4 and CO, and CO2 at 10^-3 to 10^-2 reproduce the 0.8-5.2 μm JWST spectra of K2-18b.