The Typing Cure: Experiences with Large Language Model Chatbots for Mental Health Support
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GD2JENOJrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
People experiencing severe distress increasingly use Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots as mental health support tools. Discussions on social media have described how engagements were lifesaving for some, but evidence suggests that general-purpose LLM chatbots also have notable risks that could endanger the welfare of users if not designed responsibly. In this study, we investigate the lived experiences of people who have used LLM chatbots for mental health support. We build on interviews with 21 individuals from globally diverse backgrounds to analyze how users create unique support roles for their chatbots, fill in gaps in everyday care, and navigate associated cultural limitations when seeking support from chatbots. We ground our analysis in psychotherapy literature around effective support, and introduce the concept of therapeutic alignment, or aligning AI with therapeutic values for mental health contexts. Our study offers recommendations for how designers can approach the ethical and effective use of LLM chatbots and other AI mental health support tools in mental health care.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Impact of Security and Privacy Controls on Users' Emotional Engagement with Generative AI Chatbots
In a vignette study of 354 U.S. participants, deletion-based privacy controls outperformed all other controls in increasing willingness to engage with GenAI chatbots for emotional support, while technically complex co...
-
Chaplains' Reflections on the Design and Usage of AI for Conversational Care
Chaplains view AI chatbots as unable to provide attuned pastoral care for non-clinical emotional needs, based on themes of listening, connecting, carrying, and wanting.
-
"I Said Things I Needed to Hear Myself": Peer Support as an Emotional, Organisational, and Sociotechnical Practice in Singapore
An interview study with 20 Singapore peer supporters maps their emotional, organisational, and sociocultural practices and derives design directions for culturally responsive digital tools and responsible AI augmentat...
-
"Is This Really a Human Peer Supporter?": Misalignments Between Peer Supporters and Experts in LLM-Supported Interactions
Mixed-methods studies of an LLM-supported peer support system uncover systematic misalignments where mental health experts flag critical safety and fidelity issues in peer responses that the supporters themselves do n...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.