Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ACCESS: Prompt Engineering for Automated Web Accessibility Violation Corrections

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16450 v2 pith:VT2AJM3J submitted 2024-01-28 cs.HC cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.SE
keywords accessibilityaccesscontenterrorsresearchapproachcorrectingcorrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the increasing need for inclusive and user-friendly technology, web accessibility is crucial to ensuring equal access to online content for individuals with disabilities, including visual, auditory, cognitive, or motor impairments. Despite the existence of accessibility guidelines and standards such as Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the Web Accessibility Initiative (W3C), over 90% of websites still fail to meet the necessary accessibility requirements. For web users with disabilities, there exists a need for a tool to automatically fix web page accessibility errors. While research has demonstrated methods to find and target accessibility errors, no research has focused on effectively correcting such violations. This paper presents a novel approach to correcting accessibility violations on the web by modifying the document object model (DOM) in real time with foundation models. Leveraging accessibility error information, large language models (LLMs), and prompt engineering techniques, we achieved greater than a 51% reduction in accessibility violation errors after corrections on our novel benchmark: ACCESS. Our work demonstrates a valuable approach toward the direction of inclusive web content, and provides directions for future research to explore advanced methods to automate web accessibility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Protocol for Evaluating the Accessibility of AI-Generated Educational Materials: Prompt Configuration, WCAG-Derived Criteria, and Content Overload

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new open protocol and rubric for evaluating WCAG accessibility of AI-generated educational content, with an exploratory test showing configured prompts far outperform generic ones.

  2. AccessGuru: Leveraging LLMs to Detect and Correct Web Accessibility Violations in HTML Code

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AccessGuru combines accessibility testing tools and LLM prompting to correct syntactic, semantic, and layout HTML accessibility violations, reporting up to 84% average violation score decrease on a new benchmark.

Pith tools