REVIEW 2 cited by
ACCESS: Prompt Engineering for Automated Web Accessibility Violation Corrections
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the increasing need for inclusive and user-friendly technology, web accessibility is crucial to ensuring equal access to online content for individuals with disabilities, including visual, auditory, cognitive, or motor impairments. Despite the existence of accessibility guidelines and standards such as Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the Web Accessibility Initiative (W3C), over 90% of websites still fail to meet the necessary accessibility requirements. For web users with disabilities, there exists a need for a tool to automatically fix web page accessibility errors. While research has demonstrated methods to find and target accessibility errors, no research has focused on effectively correcting such violations. This paper presents a novel approach to correcting accessibility violations on the web by modifying the document object model (DOM) in real time with foundation models. Leveraging accessibility error information, large language models (LLMs), and prompt engineering techniques, we achieved greater than a 51% reduction in accessibility violation errors after corrections on our novel benchmark: ACCESS. Our work demonstrates a valuable approach toward the direction of inclusive web content, and provides directions for future research to explore advanced methods to automate web accessibility.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Protocol for Evaluating the Accessibility of AI-Generated Educational Materials: Prompt Configuration, WCAG-Derived Criteria, and Content Overload
A new open protocol and rubric for evaluating WCAG accessibility of AI-generated educational content, with an exploratory test showing configured prompts far outperform generic ones.
-
AccessGuru: Leveraging LLMs to Detect and Correct Web Accessibility Violations in HTML Code
AccessGuru combines accessibility testing tools and LLM prompting to correct syntactic, semantic, and layout HTML accessibility violations, reporting up to 84% average violation score decrease on a new benchmark.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.