Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unified Physical-Digital Face Attack Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17699 v1 pith:CUYAHCKD submitted 2024-01-31 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords unifiedattackattacksdetectionfacedatasetdigitalmodule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Face Recognition (FR) systems can suffer from physical (i.e., print photo) and digital (i.e., DeepFake) attacks. However, previous related work rarely considers both situations at the same time. This implies the deployment of multiple models and thus more computational burden. The main reasons for this lack of an integrated model are caused by two factors: (1) The lack of a dataset including both physical and digital attacks with ID consistency which means the same ID covers the real face and all attack types; (2) Given the large intra-class variance between these two attacks, it is difficult to learn a compact feature space to detect both attacks simultaneously. To address these issues, we collect a Unified physical-digital Attack dataset, called UniAttackData. The dataset consists of $1,800$ participations of 2 and 12 physical and digital attacks, respectively, resulting in a total of 29,706 videos. Then, we propose a Unified Attack Detection framework based on Vision-Language Models (VLMs), namely UniAttackDetection, which includes three main modules: the Teacher-Student Prompts (TSP) module, focused on acquiring unified and specific knowledge respectively; the Unified Knowledge Mining (UKM) module, designed to capture a comprehensive feature space; and the Sample-Level Prompt Interaction (SLPI) module, aimed at grasping sample-level semantics. These three modules seamlessly form a robust unified attack detection framework. Extensive experiments on UniAttackData and three other datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach for unified face attack detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unified Face Attack Detection via Fine-Grained Semantic Guidance

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Fine-grained MLLM-generated forgery descriptions plus dual global/fine-grained visual-text alignment yield more generalizable face-attack detectors than vision-only or coarse-text methods.

  2. Are Foundation Models All You Need for Zero-shot Face Presentation Attack Detection?

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Frozen CLIP and DINO features with a small trained classification head can detect face presentation attacks in zero-shot settings, and simple score fusion improves cross-database performance.

Pith tools