REVIEW 2 cited by
2AFC Prompting of Large Multimodal Models for Image Quality Assessment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While abundant research has been conducted on improving high-level visual understanding and reasoning capabilities of large multimodal models~(LMMs), their visual quality assessment~(IQA) ability has been relatively under-explored. Here we take initial steps towards this goal by employing the two-alternative forced choice~(2AFC) prompting, as 2AFC is widely regarded as the most reliable way of collecting human opinions of visual quality. Subsequently, the global quality score of each image estimated by a particular LMM can be efficiently aggregated using the maximum a posterior estimation. Meanwhile, we introduce three evaluation criteria: consistency, accuracy, and correlation, to provide comprehensive quantifications and deeper insights into the IQA capability of five LMMs. Extensive experiments show that existing LMMs exhibit remarkable IQA ability on coarse-grained quality comparison, but there is room for improvement on fine-grained quality discrimination. The proposed dataset sheds light on the future development of IQA models based on LMMs. The codes will be made publicly available at https://github.com/h4nwei/2AFC-LMMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
AI-generated Image Quality Assessment in Visual Communication
AIGI-VC is a 2,500-image benchmark for judging AI-generated ads on clarity and emotional impact, and current IQA metrics and open LMMs mostly fail at it.
-
Towards Unified Benchmark and Models for Multi-Modal Perceptual Metrics
A new benchmark and fine-tuned models show that multi-task training improves average perceptual-similarity accuracy on known tasks but does not generalize to out-of-distribution perceptual tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.