Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ExtremeCast: Boosting Extreme Value Prediction for Global Weather Forecast

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01295 v4 pith:LY3R7264 submitted 2024-02-02 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords extremeforecastweathergloballossmodelspredictionintroduce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Data-driven weather forecast based on machine learning (ML) has experienced rapid development and demonstrated superior performance in the global medium-range forecast compared to traditional physics-based dynamical models. However, most of these ML models struggle with accurately predicting extreme weather, which is related to training loss and the uncertainty of weather systems. Through mathematical analysis, we prove that the use of symmetric losses, such as the Mean Squared Error (MSE), leads to biased predictions and underestimation of extreme values. To address this issue, we introduce Exloss, a novel loss function that performs asymmetric optimization and highlights extreme values to obtain accurate extreme weather forecast. Beyond the evolution in training loss, we introduce a training-free extreme value enhancement module named ExBooster, which captures the uncertainty in prediction outcomes by employing multiple random samples, thereby increasing the hit rate of low-probability extreme events. Combined with an advanced global weather forecast model, extensive experiments show that our solution can achieve state-of-the-art performance in extreme weather prediction, while maintaining the overall forecast accuracy comparable to the top medium-range forecast models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A comparison of stretched-grid and limited-area modelling for data-driven regional weather forecasting

    physics.ao-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Stretched-grid and limited-area machine-learning weather models are competitive for Europe, with stretched-grid models showing better generalization to unseen forecast times and limited-area models benefiting from ext...

  2. ExEBench: Benchmarking Foundation Models on Extreme Earth Events

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ExEBench packages seven extreme-event datasets into standardized forecasting and mapping tasks and benchmarks several AI foundation models under different fine-tuning strategies.

  3. Uncovering Insights of Compound Flooding with Data-Driven AI

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces SF2Bench, a new multi-factor South Florida flood dataset, and uses model ablations to argue for groundwater dominance and spatial-over-temporal context, though the paper's own results are internally inconsistent.

Pith tools