Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01662 v4 pith:2JGQSPUW submitted 2024-01-14 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords generativeghostsagentsafterlivescreateincludingnovelpeople
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI systems quickly improve in both breadth and depth of performance, they lend themselves to creating increasingly powerful and realistic agents, including the possibility of agents modeled on specific people. We anticipate that within our lifetimes it may become common practice for people to create custom AI agents to interact with loved ones and/or the broader world after death; indeed, the past year has seen a boom in startups purporting to offer such services. We call these generative ghosts, since such agents will be capable of generating novel content rather than merely parroting content produced by their creator while living. In this paper, we reflect on the history of technologies for AI afterlives, including current early attempts by individual enthusiasts and startup companies to create generative ghosts. We then introduce a novel design space detailing potential implementations of generative ghosts, and use this analytic framework to ground discussion of the practical and ethical implications of various approaches to designing generative ghosts, including potential positive and negative impacts on individuals and society. Based on these considerations, we lay out a research agenda for the AI and HCI research communities to better understand the risk/benefit landscape of this novel technology so as to ultimately empower people who wish to create and interact with AI afterlives to do so in a beneficial manner.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Social Media Clones: Exploring the Impact of Social Delegation with AI Clones through a Design Workbook Study

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using interviews and a design workbook with 32 social media users, the study finds that AI clones may create convenience and comfort but also threaten authenticity, increase skepticism, and lead users to mimic their clones.

  2. Signals of Provenance: Practices & Challenges of Navigating Indicators in AI-Generated Media for Sighted and Blind Individuals

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Both sighted and blind/low-vision users frequently overlook platform AI labels and rely on titles, comments, and other content cues, with blind users further hindered by inaccessible label design.

Pith tools