REVIEW 2 cited by
Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As AI systems quickly improve in both breadth and depth of performance, they lend themselves to creating increasingly powerful and realistic agents, including the possibility of agents modeled on specific people. We anticipate that within our lifetimes it may become common practice for people to create custom AI agents to interact with loved ones and/or the broader world after death; indeed, the past year has seen a boom in startups purporting to offer such services. We call these generative ghosts, since such agents will be capable of generating novel content rather than merely parroting content produced by their creator while living. In this paper, we reflect on the history of technologies for AI afterlives, including current early attempts by individual enthusiasts and startup companies to create generative ghosts. We then introduce a novel design space detailing potential implementations of generative ghosts, and use this analytic framework to ground discussion of the practical and ethical implications of various approaches to designing generative ghosts, including potential positive and negative impacts on individuals and society. Based on these considerations, we lay out a research agenda for the AI and HCI research communities to better understand the risk/benefit landscape of this novel technology so as to ultimately empower people who wish to create and interact with AI afterlives to do so in a beneficial manner.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Social Media Clones: Exploring the Impact of Social Delegation with AI Clones through a Design Workbook Study
Using interviews and a design workbook with 32 social media users, the study finds that AI clones may create convenience and comfort but also threaten authenticity, increase skepticism, and lead users to mimic their clones.
-
Signals of Provenance: Practices & Challenges of Navigating Indicators in AI-Generated Media for Sighted and Blind Individuals
Both sighted and blind/low-vision users frequently overlook platform AI labels and rely on titles, comments, and other content cues, with blind users further hindered by inaccessible label design.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.