Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Robust Multi-Task Learning with Excess Risks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02009 v3 pith:TJD77JDV submitted 2024-02-03 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords tasksexcesslearningtaskweightsconvergenceexcessmtlmulti-task
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-task learning (MTL) considers learning a joint model for multiple tasks by optimizing a convex combination of all task losses. To solve the optimization problem, existing methods use an adaptive weight updating scheme, where task weights are dynamically adjusted based on their respective losses to prioritize difficult tasks. However, these algorithms face a great challenge whenever label noise is present, in which case excessive weights tend to be assigned to noisy tasks that have relatively large Bayes optimal errors, thereby overshadowing other tasks and causing performance to drop across the board. To overcome this limitation, we propose Multi-Task Learning with Excess Risks (ExcessMTL), an excess risk-based task balancing method that updates the task weights by their distances to convergence instead. Intuitively, ExcessMTL assigns higher weights to worse-trained tasks that are further from convergence. To estimate the excess risks, we develop an efficient and accurate method with Taylor approximation. Theoretically, we show that our proposed algorithm achieves convergence guarantees and Pareto stationarity. Empirically, we evaluate our algorithm on various MTL benchmarks and demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods in the presence of label noise. Our code is available at https://github.com/yifei-he/ExcessMTL.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Distributionally Robust Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Task Sampling

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DRATS derives a minimax objective from a feasibility formulation of MTRL to adaptively sample tasks with the largest return gaps, leading to better worst-task performance on MetaWorld benchmarks.

  2. AutoScale: Linear Scalarization Guided by Multi-Task Optimization Metrics

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AutoScale selects fixed linear-scalarization weights by optimizing multi-task optimization metrics during a short exploration phase, matching grid-searched performance without search.

Pith tools