Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine Intelligence in Africa: a survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02218 v1 pith:UHMNCWWA submitted 2024-02-03 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords africaafricanintelligencemachineaudiobusinessescountriesculture-aware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the last 5 years, the availability of large audio datasets in African countries has opened unlimited opportunities to build machine intelligence (MI) technologies that are closer to the people and speak, learn, understand, and do businesses in local languages, including for those who cannot read and write. Unfortunately, these audio datasets are not fully exploited by current MI tools, leaving several Africans out of MI business opportunities. Additionally, many state-of-the-art MI models are not culture-aware, and the ethics of their adoption indexes are questionable. The lack thereof is a major drawback in many applications in Africa. This paper summarizes recent developments in machine intelligence in Africa from a multi-layer multiscale and culture-aware ethics perspective, showcasing MI use cases in 54 African countries through 400 articles on MI research, industry, government actions, as well as uses in art, music, the informal economy, and small businesses in Africa. The survey also opens discussions on the reliability of MI rankings and indexes in the African continent as well as algorithmic definitions of unclear terms used in MI.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Machine Mirages: Defining the Undefined

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A conceptual paper defines 34 AI failure modes with formula-like conditions, proposes expectile-value-at-risk quantification, and proves mostly tautological or trivial existence and impossibility results without experiments.

Pith tools