Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How Free is Parameter-Free Stochastic Optimization?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03126 v3 pith:OGJE2EYO submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML
keywords parameter-freestochasticboundmethodsfullyoptimizationproblemaccess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of parameter-free stochastic optimization, inquiring whether, and under what conditions, do fully parameter-free methods exist: these are methods that achieve convergence rates competitive with optimally tuned methods, without requiring significant knowledge of the true problem parameters. Existing parameter-free methods can only be considered ``partially'' parameter-free, as they require some non-trivial knowledge of the true problem parameters, such as a bound on the stochastic gradient norms, a bound on the distance to a minimizer, etc. In the non-convex setting, we demonstrate that a simple hyperparameter search technique results in a fully parameter-free method that outperforms more sophisticated state-of-the-art algorithms. We also provide a similar result in the convex setting with access to noisy function values under mild noise assumptions. Finally, assuming only access to stochastic gradients, we establish a lower bound that renders fully parameter-free stochastic convex optimization infeasible, and provide a method which is (partially) parameter-free up to the limit indicated by our lower bound.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AutoSGD: Automatic Learning Rate Selection for Stochastic Gradient Descent

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AutoSGD runs three parallel SGD streams at nearby learning rates, uses paired noisy objective estimates to pick the winner, and is claimed to converge with little user tuning.

Pith tools