REVIEW 2 cited by
Detecting Scams Using Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Detecting Scams Using Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained prominence in various applications, including security. This paper explores the utility of LLMs in scam detection, a critical aspect of cybersecurity. Unlike traditional applications, we propose a novel use case for LLMs to identify scams, such as phishing, advance fee fraud, and romance scams. We present notable security applications of LLMs and discuss the unique challenges posed by scams. Specifically, we outline the key steps involved in building an effective scam detector using LLMs, emphasizing data collection, preprocessing, model selection, training, and integration into target systems. Additionally, we conduct a preliminary evaluation using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a duplicated email, highlighting their proficiency in identifying common signs of phishing or scam emails. The results demonstrate the models' effectiveness in recognizing suspicious elements, but we emphasize the need for a comprehensive assessment across various language tasks. The paper concludes by underlining the importance of ongoing refinement and collaboration with cybersecurity experts to adapt to evolving threats.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLM-Assisted Authentication and Fraud Detection
LLM semantic authentication accepts 99.5% of legitimate non-exact answers at 0.1% false-accept rate while RAG fraud detection lowers false positives from 17.2% to 3.5%.
-
Read This Paper to Get $50 Million:* An Analysis of Mobile Messaging Scams Using Reddit Data
Reddit data analysis shows reply-based mobile scams growing nearly twice as fast as click-based ones while evading commercial and open-source detectors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.