Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A quantitative analysis of knowledge-learning preferences in large language models in molecular science

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.04119 v2 pith:G4CCACBI submitted 2024-02-06 cs.LG cs.CE

A quantitative analysis of knowledge-learning preferences in large language models in molecular science

classification cs.LG cs.CE
keywords molecularlanguagellmsmodalitiesmodelsanalysisdataintroduce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning has significantly advanced molecular modeling and design, enabling efficient understanding and discovery of novel molecules. In particular, large language models (LLMs) introduce a fresh research paradigm to tackle scientific problems from a natural language processing (NLP) perspective. LLMs significantly enhance our understanding and generation of molecules, often surpassing existing methods with their capabilities to decode and synthesize complex molecular patterns. However, two key issues remain: how to quantify the match between model and data modalities and how to identify the knowledge-learning preferences of models. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-modal benchmark, named ChEBI-20-MM, and perform 1263 experiments to assess the model's compatibility with data modalities and knowledge acquisition. Through the modal transition probability matrix, we provide insights into the most suitable modalities for tasks. Furthermore, we introduce a statistically interpretable approach to discover context-specific knowledge mapping by localized feature filtering. Our analysis offers an exploration of the learning mechanism and paves the way for advancing LLMs in molecular science.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TheBioCollection: Unified Pre-Training Scale LLM Corpus for Biology

    q-bio.QM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A 52.6B-token multi-domain biology pretraining corpus with tool enrichment and new binding/localization instructions doubles a fixed base LLM's matched biology-eval score with little language forgetting.

  2. Logics-Parsing-Omni Technical Report

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Omni Parsing framework converts complex multimodal signals into locatable, enumerable, and traceable structured knowledge via hierarchical detection, recognition, and interpreting with strict evidence alignment.

  3. Bolek: A Multimodal Language Model for Molecular Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bolek injects Morgan fingerprint embeddings into an instruction-tuned text model, then fine-tunes on molecular alignment and synthetic chain-of-thought tasks to improve performance and grounding on 15 TDC binary class...