REVIEW 2 cited by
Large Language Model for Table Processing: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Tables, typically two-dimensional and structured to store large amounts of data, are essential in daily activities like database queries, spreadsheet manipulations, web table question answering, and image table information extraction. Automating these table-centric tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs) or Visual Language Models (VLMs) offers significant public benefits, garnering interest from academia and industry. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of table-related tasks, examining both user scenarios and technical aspects. It covers traditional tasks like table question answering as well as emerging fields such as spreadsheet manipulation and table data analysis. We summarize the training techniques for LLMs and VLMs tailored for table processing. Additionally, we discuss prompt engineering, particularly the use of LLM-powered agents, for various table-related tasks. Finally, we highlight several challenges, including diverse user input when serving and slow thinking using chain-of-thought.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MDBench: A Synthetic Multi-Document Reasoning Benchmark Generated with Knowledge Guidance
MDBench is a synthetically generated, knowledge-guided benchmark for multi-document QA on which frontier LLMs achieve only about 60% exact match.
-
Table-r1: Self-supervised and Reinforcement Learning for Program-based Table Reasoning in Small Language Models
Table-r1 combines a layout-transformation self-supervised task and a mix-paradigm GRPO stage so 7B/8B models outperform other small-model table reasoners and approach GPT-4o-level accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.