Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Source Confusion from Neutron Star Binaries in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors is Minimal

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.06836 v2 pith:VYFO3KJZ submitted 2024-02-09 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords signalsconfusionneutronoverlapsourcestartime-frequencydetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Upgrades beyond the current second generation of ground-based gravitational wave detectors will allow them to observe tens of thousands neutron star and black hole binaries. Given the typical minute-to-hour duration of neutron star signals in the detector frequency band, a number of them will overlap in the time-frequency plane resulting in a nonzero cross-correlation. We examine source confusion arising from overlapping signals whose time-frequency tracks cross. Adopting the median observed merger rate of $100$ Gpc$^{-3}$yr$^{-1}$, each neutron star binary signal overlaps with an average of 42(4)[0.5] other signals when observed from 2(5)[10] Hz. The vast majority of overlaps occur at low frequencies where the inspiral evolution is slow: 91% of time-frequency overlaps occur in band below 5 Hz. The combined effect of overlapping signals does not satisfy the central limit theorem and source confusion cannot be treated as stationary, Gaussian noise: on average 0.91(0.17)[0.05] signals are present in a single adaptive time-frequency bin centered at 2(5)[10] Hz. We quantify source confusion under a realistic neutron star binary population and find that parameter uncertainty typically increases by less than 1% unless there are overlapping signals whose detector-frame chirp mass difference is $\lesssim 0.01 M_{\odot}$ and the overlap frequency is $\gtrsim$ 40 Hz. Out of $1\times10^6$ simulated signals, 0.14% fall within this region of detector-frame chirp mass differences, but their overlap frequencies are typically lower than 40 Hz. Source confusion for ground-based detectors, where events overlap instantaneously is significantly milder than the equivalent LISA problem, where many classes of events overlap for the lifetime of the mission.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hierarchical Subtraction with Neural Density Estimators as a General Solution to Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper introduces an iterative, ensemble-based hierarchical subtraction scheme powered by neural density estimators that recovers overlapping gravitational wave signals accurately and fast.

  2. Progress toward the detection of the gravitational-wave background from stellar-mass binary black holes: a mock data challenge

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mock data challenge shows that a phase-coherent search for the binary black hole background can recover injected signal fractions in realistic noise, using new treatments of noise uncertainty, finite-duration effect...

Pith tools