REVIEW 10 cited by
LoTa-Bench: Benchmarking Language-oriented Task Planners for Embodied Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently received considerable attention as alternative solutions for task planning. However, comparing the performance of language-oriented task planners becomes difficult, and there exists a dearth of detailed exploration regarding the effects of various factors such as pre-trained model selection and prompt construction. To address this, we propose a benchmark system for automatically quantifying performance of task planning for home-service embodied agents. Task planners are tested on two pairs of datasets and simulators: 1) ALFRED and AI2-THOR, 2) an extension of Watch-And-Help and VirtualHome. Using the proposed benchmark system, we perform extensive experiments with LLMs and prompts, and explore several enhancements of the baseline planner. We expect that the proposed benchmark tool would accelerate the development of language-oriented task planners.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
When Robots Do the Chores: A Benchmark and Agent for Long-Horizon Household Task Execution
LongAct benchmark evaluates long-horizon household task execution from free-form instructions; HoloMind agent raises performance but top VLMs still reach only 59% goal completion and 16% full-task success.
-
ST-BiBench: Benchmarking Multi-Stream Multimodal Coordination in Bimanual Embodied Tasks for MLLMs
ST-BiBench reveals a coordination paradox in which MLLMs show strong high-level strategic reasoning yet fail at fine-grained 16-dimensional bimanual action synthesis and multi-stream fusion.
-
SAFE-Pruner: Semantic Attention-Guided Future-Aware Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Manipulation
SAFE-Pruner forecasts deep-layer visual-token saliency from historical attention maps and refreshes at subtask boundaries, enabling up to 1.89x faster VLA inference with minimal success-rate drop.
-
When Robots Do the Chores: A Benchmark and Agent for Long-Horizon Household Task Execution
LongAct benchmark reveals top VLMs reach only 59% goal completion and 16% full success on long-horizon household tasks, while HoloMind agent improves results via DAG planner, multimodal spatial memory, episodic memory...
-
PLanAR: Planning-Language-Grounded Agentic Reasoning for Robot Manipulation
AgenticLab's closed-loop planning-language pipeline lets different vision-language models drive a real robot, and benchmark tests show action-verification quality, not planning, determines long-horizon success.
-
A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AI
This is the first survey on vision-language-action models, providing a taxonomy across three lines, plus summaries of datasets, simulators, benchmarks, challenges, and future directions in embodied AI.
-
SAFE-Pruner: Semantic Attention-Guided Future-Aware Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Manipulation
SAFE-Pruner forecasts deep-layer token saliency in VLA models via semantic attention consistency and adaptive subtask detection to achieve up to 1.89x speedup with under 1.7% success rate loss.
-
TaskGround: Structured Executable Task Inference for Full-Scene Household Reasoning
TaskGround introduces a Ground-Infer-Execute framework for full-scene household reasoning that improves success rates on the FullHome benchmark and enables compact models to match larger ones at up to 18x lower token cost.
-
Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action
A policy analysis arguing that embodied AI risks are real, under-covered by current US/EU/UK frameworks, and best handled through certification, benchmarks, clarified liability, and economic adaptation.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.