REVIEW 5 cited by
Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The inverse reinforcement learning approach to imitation learning is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can enable learning from a smaller number of expert demonstrations with more robustness to error compounding than behavioral cloning approaches. On the other hand, it requires that the learner repeatedly solve a computationally expensive reinforcement learning (RL) problem. Often, much of this computation is wasted searching over policies very dissimilar to the expert's. In this work, we propose using hybrid RL -- training on a mixture of online and expert data -- to curtail unnecessary exploration. Intuitively, the expert data focuses the learner on good states during training, which reduces the amount of exploration required to compute a strong policy. Notably, such an approach doesn't need the ability to reset the learner to arbitrary states in the environment, a requirement of prior work in efficient inverse RL. More formally, we derive a reduction from inverse RL to expert-competitive RL (rather than globally optimal RL) that allows us to dramatically reduce interaction during the inner policy search loop while maintaining the benefits of the IRL approach. This allows us to derive both model-free and model-based hybrid inverse RL algorithms with strong policy performance guarantees. Empirically, we find that our approaches are significantly more sample efficient than standard inverse RL and several other baselines on a suite of continuous control tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Your Learned Constraint is Secretly a Backward Reachable Tube
Inverse constraint learning recovers the backward reachable tube (states where failure is inevitable), not the true failure set, and this makes learned constraints dynamics-dependent.
-
Your Self-Play Algorithm is Secretly an Adversarial Imitator: Understanding LLM Self-Play through the Lens of Imitation Learning
LLM self-play finetuning is equivalent to adversarial imitation learning; the chi-squared regularized variant SPIF bounds rewards and improves stability.
-
Beyond-Expert Performance with Limited Demonstrations: Efficient Imitation Learning with Double Exploration
ILDE combines VAIL imitation, GIRIL curiosity, and a state-entropy bonus to beat expert scores on 6 Atari games and match or slightly beat GIRIL on MuJoCo, using only 10% of one-life demonstrations.
-
From Foresight to Forethought: VLM-In-the-Loop Policy Steering via Latent Alignment
FOREWARN steers a diffusion robot policy at runtime by using a world model to predict latent futures and a vision-language model to narrate and rank those futures in natural language.
-
FAIL: Flow Matching Adversarial Imitation Learning for Image Generation
Post-training of flow matching can be framed as adversarial imitation learning, and the proposed FAIL methods improve FLUX's generation quality using 13K expert images without preference pairs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.