Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Localization engineering by resonant driving in dissipative polariton arrays

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Submitted 14 Feb 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that the polariton-polariton interaction leads to a frequency shift of the optimal localization condition that could be used to further control it.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.51 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2402.09104 (version 2)
Pith IDZU2HSE4T, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGonzalo Usaj. "Localization engineering by resonant driving in dissipative polariton arrays." arXiv:2402.09104 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/ZU2HSE4T
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,961 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Arrays of microcavity polaritons are very versatile systems that allow for broad possibilities for the engineering of multi-orbital lattice geometries using different state preparation schemes. One of these schemes, spatially modulated resonant driving, can be used to selectively localize the polariton field on a particular region of the lattice. Both the frequency and the spatial amplitude distribution (module and phase) of the driven laser field are important and serve as a knob to control the extend of the spatial localization. Here, we analyse both the linear and nonlinear regimes using the lattice Green function formalism that is particularly suitable for the case of polariton arrays described in a tight-binding approximation. We identify the conditions for maximum localization on arbitrary lattice's geometries and discuss some experimentally relevant cases. We find that the polariton-polariton interaction leads to a frequency shift of the optimal localization condition that could be used to further control it.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Arrays of microcavity polaritons are very versatile systems that allow for broad possibilities for the engineering of multi-orbital lattice geometries using different state preparation schemes. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.90
s1 One of these schemes, spatially modulated resonant driving, can be used to selectively localize the polariton field on a particular region of the lattice. background 0.61 0.12 0.07 hedged possibility 0.50
s2 Both the frequency and the spatial amplitude distribution (module and phase) of the driven laser field are important and serve as a knob to control the extend of the spatial localization. background 0.46 0.23 0.09 asserted 1.00
s3 Here, we analyse both the linear and nonlinear regimes using the lattice Green function formalism that is particularly suitable for the case of polariton arrays described in a tight-binding approximation. method 0.97 0.92 0.04 asserted 0.99
s4 We identify the conditions for maximum localization on arbitrary lattice's geometries and discuss some experimentally relevant cases. contribution 0.93 0.91 0.16 asserted 0.97
s5 We find that the polariton-polariton interaction leads to a frequency shift of the optimal localization condition that could be used to further control it. result 0.97 0.95 0.48 hedged possibility 0.51

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Arrays of microcavity polaritons are very versatile systems that allow for broad possibilities for the engineering of multi-orbital lattice geometries using different state preparation schemes. One of these schemes, spatially modulated resonant driving, can be used to selectively localize the polariton field on a particular region of the lattice. Both the frequency and the spatial amplitude distribution (module and phase) of the driven laser field are important and serve as a knob to control the extend of the spatial localization. Here, we analyse both the linear and nonlinear regimes using the lattice Green function formalism that is particularly suitable for the case of polariton arrays described in a tight-binding approximation. We identify the conditions for maximum localization on arbitrary lattice's geometries and discuss some experimentally relevant cases. We find that the polariton-polariton interaction leads to a frequency shift of the optimal localization condition that could be used to further control it.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.