Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal Automated Market Makers: Differentiable Economics and Strong Duality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09129 v1 pith:WHPAZSUA submitted 2024-02-14 cs.GT cs.AIecon.THq-fin.TR

classification cs.GTcs.AIecon.THq-fin.TR
keywords optimalmarketmakergoodsmechanismsadverseautomatedbehavior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The role of a market maker is to simultaneously offer to buy and sell quantities of goods, often a financial asset such as a share, at specified prices. An automated market maker (AMM) is a mechanism that offers to trade according to some predetermined schedule; the best choice of this schedule depends on the market maker's goals. The literature on the design of AMMs has mainly focused on prediction markets with the goal of information elicitation. More recent work motivated by DeFi has focused instead on the goal of profit maximization, but considering only a single type of good (traded with a numeraire), including under adverse selection (Milionis et al. 2022). Optimal market making in the presence of multiple goods, including the possibility of complex bundling behavior, is not well understood. In this paper, we show that finding an optimal market maker is dual to an optimal transport problem, with specific geometric constraints on the transport plan in the dual. We show that optimal mechanisms for multiple goods and under adverse selection can take advantage of bundling, both improved prices for bundled purchases and sales as well as sometimes accepting payment "in kind." We present conjectures of optimal mechanisms in additional settings which show further complex behavior. From a methodological perspective, we make essential use of the tools of differentiable economics to generate conjectures of optimal mechanisms, and give a proof-of-concept for the use of such tools in guiding theoretical investigations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Truthful Mechanisms without Discretization

    cs.GT 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TEDI learns truthful, revenue-maximizing mechanisms by representing prices as continuous partially convex functions and training them with a covariance gradient trick and Langevin sampling, without discretizing outcomes.

Pith tools