Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09638 v1 pith:J4TF2VFN submitted 2024-02-15 cs.LG cs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.NE
keywords optimizationsurveymulti-fidelitychallengescomputationalfidelityseveralaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world black-box optimization often involves time-consuming or costly experiments and simulations. Multi-fidelity optimization (MFO) stands out as a cost-effective strategy that balances high-fidelity accuracy with computational efficiency through a hierarchical fidelity approach. This survey presents a systematic exploration of MFO, underpinned by a novel text mining framework based on a pre-trained language model. We delve deep into the foundational principles and methodologies of MFO, focusing on three core components -- multi-fidelity surrogate models, fidelity management strategies, and optimization techniques. Additionally, this survey highlights the diverse applications of MFO across several key domains, including machine learning, engineering design optimization, and scientific discovery, showcasing the adaptability and effectiveness of MFO in tackling complex computational challenges. Furthermore, we also envision several emerging challenges and prospects in the MFO landscape, spanning scalability, the composition of lower fidelities, and the integration of human-in-the-loop approaches at the algorithmic level. We also address critical issues related to benchmarking and the advancement of open science within the MFO community. Overall, this survey aims to catalyze further research and foster collaborations in MFO, setting the stage for future innovations and breakthroughs in the field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Data

    stat.ML 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Augmenting a high-fidelity GP's inputs with predictions from all low-fidelity surrogates improves accuracy and cuts cost versus cokriging and autoregressive multifidelity GPs on scarce-data problems.

  2. Optimization-Embedded Active Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Learning for Multi-Condition Airfoil Shape Optimization

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Uncertainty-triggered multi-fidelity GPs inside a hybrid GA redesign a 12-parameter CST airfoil for two flight conditions with only ~10–15% RANS calls and large reported gains over generation 1.

  3. Tree-Structured Parzen Estimator Can Solve Black-Box Combinatorial Optimization More Efficiently

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A distance-based categorical kernel and two algorithmic modifications let TPE optimize combinatorial spaces more efficiently than the original TPE on synthetic benchmarks.

  4. Bayesian and non-Bayesian multi-fidelity surrogate models for multi-objective aerodynamic optimization under extreme cost imbalance

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AR1 co-kriging with Bayesian infill outperforms multi-fidelity neural networks with non-Bayesian infill on an outlet guide vane problem under a 20-sample high-fidelity budget, and POD dimension reduction improves ever...

Pith tools