REVIEW 1 cited by
TOAD: Task-Oriented Automatic Dialogs with Diverse Response Styles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In light of recent advances in large language models (LLMs), the expectations for the next generation of virtual assistants include enhanced naturalness and adaptability across diverse usage scenarios. However, the creation of high-quality annotated data for Task-Oriented Dialog (TOD) is recognized to be slow and costly. To address these challenges, we introduce Task-Oriented Automatic Dialogs (TOAD), a novel and scalable TOD dataset along with its automatic generation pipeline. The TOAD dataset simulates realistic app context interaction and provide a variety of system response style options. Two aspects of system response styles are considered, verbosity level and users' expression mirroring. We benchmark TOAD on two response generation tasks, and the results show that modeling more verbose responses or responses without user expression mirroring is more challenging.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MemGuide: Intent-Driven Memory Selection for Goal-Oriented Multi-Session LLM Agents
MemGuide retrieves and filters past dialogue memories by intent and missing slots, and on its new synthetic benchmark MS-TOD it improves task success by 11 points and shortens dialogues by 2.84 turns.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.